Skip to content

Efficacy of Lazolex® Gel in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex

Efficacy of Lazolex® Gel in the Treatment of Herpes Simplex Mucocutaneous Infections and the Prevention of Recurrences: A Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06089252
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-10-18
Start date
2007-11-27
Completion date
2008-01-28
Last updated
2023-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HSV Infection

Brief summary

Study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of Lazolex®, an emollient gel, to treat mucocutaneous lesions caused by herpes simplex virus.

Detailed description

A single-center, single-arm, open-label, phase II clinical trial was conducted with 30 patients divided into two groups: 15 patients with herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infections and 15 with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infections. All received topical treatment with Lazolex® Gel four times daily for 10 days. The efficacy and tolerance of the treatment were evaluated on day 10 and day 20 after the study started. In addition, recurrence rates were evaluated before treatment with Lazolex® and after a 4-year follow-up period after treatment.

Interventions

DRUGwalnut extract

Four times a day over a 10-day period

Sponsors

Iveriapharma LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Lazolex gel

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of acute or chronic herpes simplex mucocutaneous infection, * mild course of disease (defined as body temperature \<37.2°C and without signs of general infirmity), * application of last treatment for herpes simplex infection \>3 months, * available to cooperate during the study, * provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* abnormal laboratory results, * hypersensitivity to the product or its components, * pregnancy or breastfeeding, * acute/ chronic renal or liver failure, * history of migraine, * organic brain lesion, * generalized anxiety disorder, * blood supply disturbance in the vertebrobasilar pool, * stage 3 essential hypertension, * concomitant acute or decompensated disease that could affect the study results, * intake of acyclovir, antibiotics, immunosuppressants, antimetabolites, or glucocorticosteroids during 3-month period prior to the study, * concomitant participation in another clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Course of the disease10 daysLazolex® Gel was classified as effective if herpes lesions improved or healed after treatment. The median effective time (ET50), defined as the time (in days) needed to reach complete recovery in 50% of the patients, was used as the main variable for Lazolex® Gel efficacy.
Change in outbreak frequency10 daysLazolex® Gel was classified as effective if herpes lesions improved or healed after treatment. The median effective time (ET50), defined as the time (in days) needed to reach complete recovery in 50% of the patients, was used as the main variable for Lazolex® Gel efficacy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The degree of patient satisfaction10 daysThe level of patient satisfaction with treatment efficacy was categorized as high, medium, or low using a self-questionnaire.
Number of complaints and symptoms10 daysTolerance outcomes were evaluated using both objective and subjective criteria. The objective criteria included the comparison of laboratory tests and physical examinations before and after Lazolex® Gel treatment. The subjective criteria included complaints and symptoms reported by patients. In the event of adverse reactions, they were assessed by attending physicians. Individual tolerance was categorized as follows: Very satisfactory: No clinically significant changes in physical examination or laboratory tests, and no adverse reactions. Satisfactory: Insignificant changes in physical examination or laboratory tests, or mild adverse reactions that do not require a change in treatment. Unsatisfactory: Significant changes in physical examination or laboratory tests and/or the occurrence of adverse reactions that require the withdrawal of the product, as well as prescribing treatment to address the adverse reaction

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026