Skip to content

PROmOting Gynecologic Cancer Patients With Frailty to Achieve Functional Recovery

PROmOting Gynecologic Cancer Patients With Frailty to Achieve Functional Recovery - PROOF Prospective Cohort Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06089083
Acronym
PROOF
Enrollment
500
Registered
2023-10-18
Start date
2023-10-18
Completion date
2033-11-30
Last updated
2026-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm, Gynecologic Cancer, Gynecologic Neoplasm

Keywords

Frailty, Risk Factors

Brief summary

This study seeks to understand how frailty, a term that describes people who are more vulnerable stressors such as a new medical problem, affects the outcomes and quality of life in adult patients with gynecologic cancer.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. Assess the risk factors associated with frailty in newly diagnosed gynecologic cancer participants. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Compare primary quality of life endpoint of "healthy days at home" between non-frail and frail participants (primary quality of life endpoint). II. Compare other perioperative, oncologic, and quality of life outcomes between non-frail and frail participants. OUTLINE: This is an observational study. All new patients being evaluated for a new diagnosis of gynecologic cancer by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) Gynecologic Oncology service and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute will be recruited in both the outpatient or inpatient setting. Study participants will be enrolled at the time of diagnosis and followed for up to one year after undergoing surgery for cancer.

Interventions

Physical assessments of frailty will be conducted in person.

OTHERSelf-reported Assessments and Questionnaires

Quality of life questionnaires and self-reported measures will be provided to complete during the course of the study

PROCEDURESurgery (Standard of Care, Non-Interventional)

Surgical data will be reviewed via medical record

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER
Conquer Cancer Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
American Society of Clinical Oncology
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or greater * Undergoing evaluation for a newly diagnosed gynecologic malignancy * Ability of individual or legal guardian/representative to understand a written informed consent document, and the willingness to sign it

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindication to any study-related procedure or assessment * Does not speak a language for which the consent form and study materials are available

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants who are categorized as frailAt time of enrollment, 1 dayThe Fried frailty phenotype (FP) assesses physical frailty through five criteria: unintentional weight loss; weakness or poor handgrip strength; self-reported exhaustion; slow walking speed; and low physical activity. Participants who receive a score of \>3 will be categorized as 'frail'. Participants who receive a score \<=3 will be categorized as Non-frail at time of enrollment.
Demographic risk factors associated with those who screen positive for frailtyAt time of enrollment, 1 dayDemographic risk factors obtained from medical record review (i.e. sex, age, race, ethnicity, cancer type, cancer histology, cancer stage, comorbidities, etc.) will be assessed and analyzed for differences between participants categorized as frail versus non-frail.
Oncologic risk factors associated with those who screen positive for frailtyAt time of enrollment, 1 dayRisk factors determined to be oncologic in nature will be assessed and analyzed for differences between participants categorized as frail versus non-frail.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean number of healthy days at homeUp to 10 yearsThe number of healthy days at home is defined as healthy days at home is defined as: 365 days minus (1) mortality days, (2) total number of days spent in inpatient, observation, skilled nursing facilities (SNF), rehabilitation, long-term hospital settings, emergency department and will be summarized and used as covariate in analysis.
Mean length of hospital stayUp to 10 yearsThe number of days participants stay in the hospital following standard of care surgery for gynecological cancer will be summarized and used as covariate in analysis.
Percentage of participants readmitted to hospitalUp to 10 yearsParticipants with documented re-admission to a hospital following standard of care surgery for gynecological cancer will be summarized and used as a covariate in analysis.
Percentage of participants with reported surgical complicationsUp to 10 yearsParticipants with documented peri-operative complications following standard of care surgery for gynecological cancer will be summarized and used as a covariate in analysis.
Mean time to initiation of standard of care chemotherapyUp to 10 yearsThe median number of days following standard of care surgery for gynecological cancer to first standard of care chemotherapy initiation will be summarized and used as a covariate in analysis.
Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)Up to 10 yearsProgression free survival is defined as the time from date of diagnosis to date of radiographic progression, and/or doubling of cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) from baseline.
Median Overall Survival (OS)Up to 10 yearsOverall survival as defined by days from date of diagnosis to date of death, or study completion whichever occurs first.
Mean number of treatment delaysUp to 10 yearsChemotherapy delays is defined by the number of chemotherapy infusions that are delayed due for medical purposes and the total number of days infusions are delayed for will be summarized and used as a covariate in analysis.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTJanet Titzler
janet.titzler@ucsf.edu415-353-9600
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORStephanie Cham, MD

University of California, San Francisco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026