Skip to content

Real-life Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the SYNOVIUM HCS Device

Real-life Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the SYNOVIUM HCS Device

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06087705
Acronym
YNOVIUM
Enrollment
134
Registered
2023-10-18
Start date
2023-02-07
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2023-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gonarthrosis

Keywords

hyaluronic acid

Brief summary

Patients who are to benefit from an injection of SYNOVIUM HCS as part of their care will be offered to participate in this study. Patients will need to sign a consent form to participate. Prior to SYNOVIUM HCS injection, patients will be asked a series of questions regarding their pain and disability. Data collected during follow-up visits can be compared to pre-injection data.

Detailed description

Inclusion period: 6 months Follow-up period: * 6-month follow-up, after intra-articular injection with extension * 1 single syringe of SYNOVIUM HCS (3 mL), * Controls scheduled at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 months and up to 1 year * Additional control (single) in the event of leaving the study if this takes place outside the scheduled visit dates and before 1 year, for medical reasons * Duration of the study: Overall time estimated at 18 months * In this open-label CI, the group itself is used as a control, by comparing the scores on inclusion with those of the various control visits.

Interventions

DEVICEIntra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid

The injection must necessarily be performed by a practitioner in compliance with the rules of asepsis. Procedure of use: * Before the injection, a rigorous prior disinfection of the area to be treated will be carried out. * Check the integrity of the sterility protector. * Take the syringe and remove the protective tip. * Hold the syringe body and insert a sterile intra-articular injection needle into the Luer-Lock system. * Gently turn the needle clockwise to secure the needle in the Luer-Lock system. * A visual check of the attachment of the needle will be carried out. * Remove the needle cap. * Inject slowly.

Sponsors

EVAMED
CollaboratorOTHER
LCA Pharmaceutical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient * Patient with radiologically characterized gonarthrosis (stages Kellgren & Lawrence grades I to III) * Patient with walking pain (WOMAC A1) at least equal to 2 on the Likert scale 0-4 * Patient to benefit from an injection of SYNOVIUM HCS as part of his treatment * Patient agreeing to participate in the study * Patient affiliated to a social security scheme or benefiting from such a scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Viscosupplementation less than 6 months old * Intra-articular corticosteroid injection less than 2 months old * Inflammatory arthritis or active infectious of the knee studied * History of surgery of the lower limb concerned * Kellgren & Lawrence grades not defined * Known hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid or chondroitin sulfate * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patient under guardianship, curatorship or judicial safeguard * Patient participating in another clinical investigation, at the time of inclusion

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
device performance6 monthsevolution of the pain sub-score of the WOMAC (universities of Western Ontario and McMaster) index (A). The higher the score, the more the knee osteoarthritis has a functional impact.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
recovery of autonomy1 yearEvolution of the disability according to the patient (Likert scale 0-10, higher scores mean better outcome)
Evolution of the pain1 yearEvolution of the pain sub-score (WOMAC A)(universities of Western Ontario and McMaster) index (A). (Higher scores mean worse outcome)
Stiffness1 yearEvolution of the stiffness sub-score (WOMAC B) (universities of Western Ontario and McMaster) index (B). (Higher scores mean worse outcome)
Function1 yearEvolution of the function sub-score (WOMAC C) (universities of Western Ontario and McMaster) index (C). (Higher scores mean worse outcome)
Complication1 yearcomplication rate
Impact of the injection on concomitant treatments1 yearRecording of the consumption of analgesics and NSAIDs
long-term performance of the SYNOVIUM HCS device1 yearRate of patients having reached 1 year, without intervention on the knee concerned
Investigator's general assessment1 yearGeneral assessment by the investigator at the end of the study. (Likert scale 0-3, higher scores mean better outcome)
responder patients1 yearRate of responder patients according to the OMERACT-OARSI criteria (to the treatment, in knee osteoarthritis) (0% (no responder) to 100% (all responder))

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactPatrice VINCENT
pvin@lca-pharma.com02 37 33 39 30

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026