Spastic Hemiplegia, Stroke
Conditions
Keywords
reactive training, trunk control, balance, fall risk, gait, functional reaching, spasticity
Brief summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effectiveness of upper extremity training, which is expected for 5 seconds on the target during reaching forward, and to compare the effectiveness of neurorehabilitation interventions including reactive upper extremity trainings to be applied with different speeds and methods on body control, balance, gait, fall risk and spasticity in the individuals with stroke. The main questions it aims to answer is: • Is there a difference in the effects of neurorehabilitation interventions that include reactive upper extremity trainings applied at different speeds and methods on trunk control, balance, gait, fall risk and upper extremity spasticity? All participants will participate in the Bobath Approach-based neurorehabilitation program. This program will include scapula mobilization, trunk elongation training in sitting, and training lumbar stabilizers with bridge activity. * In addition to the neurorehabilitation program, the 1st and 2nd groups will be given a reaching exercise with LED light reactive training material (Fitpodz Light Trainer®). The LED light sensors, whose duration is set, will light up in green and red colors at random intervals. * Patients in the 1st group will be asked to reach forward and touch the sensor when the red light sensor is on, and pull back as soon as the sensor goes out. * The patients in the 2nd group will be asked to reach forward and touch the sensor when the green light sensor is lit, and to hold their hand on the sensor for 5 seconds and then withdraw it. With this method, it is aimed to create co-contraction in patients in Group 2. * In addition to the neurorehabilitation program, patients in the 3rd group (control group) will have functional stretches to the anterior, right and left while standing. Researchers will compare three groups to see if there a difference in the effects of neurorehabilitation interventions that include reactive upper extremity trainings applied at different speeds and methods.
Detailed description
* In the trainings of the 1st and 2nd groups, 4 LED light sensors will be placed on the wall at shoulder level in the standing position of the patient. The distance of the patient to the wall will be determined by using the value obtained from the Functional Reach Test according to his or her arm length. * The Bobath Approach-based neurorehabilitation training will take 30 minutes per session. * After the Bobath Approach-based neurorehabilitation training, all groups will perform 3 sets of training, 10 repetitions per set for each extremity. An equal number of stretches will be made in total in each direction, but the directions will be determined randomly. There will be a 3-minute rest break between sets. * All groups will receive training for a total of 7 weeks, 3 sessions per week.
Interventions
DEVICEreactive exercise training with ''FitPodz Light Trainer'' device in addition to a neurorehabilitation program
Attending the neurorehabilitation program that includes scapula mobilization, trunk elongation training in sitting, and training lumbar stabilizers with bridge activity. Reaching forward and touching the sensor when the red light sensor is on, and withdrawing his/her hand as soon as the sensor goes out.
DEVICEreactive exercise training with co-contraction with ''FitPodz Light Trainer'' device in addition to a neurorehabilitation program.
Attending the neurorehabilitation program that includes scapula mobilization, trunk elongation training in sitting, and training lumbar stabilizers with bridge activity. Reaching forward and touching the sensor when the green light sensor is on, and holding his/her hand on the sensor for 5 seconds and then withdrawing it.
OTHERneurorehabilitation program with functional reaching training without device.
Attending the neurorehabilitation program that includes scapula mobilization, trunk elongation training in sitting, and training lumbar stabilizers with bridge activity. Doing functional stretching to the anterior, right and left while standing.
Sponsors
Pamukkale University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Being between the ages of 18-80 * ≥3 months after stroke * Elbow flexor spasticity ≤2 according to MAS * Being able to sit independently and stand with or without walking aid * Being an individual with a Functional Ambulation Classification ≥3 * Being an individual with a Hodkinson Mental Test score ≥6
Exclusion criteria
* Presence of another neurological disease that will affect trunk control other than stroke * Having acute back or lower extremity pain * Having an acute illness (eg vomiting, fever) * Recent surgery on the upper-lower extremities or trunk * Having a condition or activity restriction that prevents participation in the program * Inability to sit or stand independently * Having abnormal or unstable cardiovascular responses to exercise * Having cognitive impairment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Trunk Control | The first measurement will be made just before starting treatment, and the second measurement will be made 7 weeks after the start of treatment (at the end of treatment). | ''Trunk Impairment Scale'' will be used to examine the effectiveness of our treatment results on trunk control. The scale consists of 17 parameters. The sections in the scale are; static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and coordination. It is scored between 0 and 23. 0 is the lowest value and 23 is the highest value and indicates good trunk control. |
| Balance | The first measurement will be made just before starting treatment, and the second measurement will be made 7 weeks after the start of treatment (at the end of treatment). | ''Mini Balance Evaluation System Test'' will be used to examine the effectiveness of our treatment results on balance. The test consists of four separate categories covering a 14-item assessment. Expected postural control (standing from sitting to standing, standing on tiptoes, standing on one palm), Reactive postural control (forward, backward, lateral compensatory stepping), Sensory orientation (hard surface with eyes open, sponge surface with eyes closed, inclined surface with eyes closed), Dynamic walking (change in walking speed, walking with horizontal head movements, pivoting while walking, stepping over obstacles, Time Up\&Go and Dual Task Time Up\&Go). In evaluating the test, each item is rated on a three-point ordinal scale (ranging from 0 = lowest level of functioning to 2 = normal level of functioning). The total score consists of the sum of the scores obtained from these items and ranges from 0 (worst) to 28 (best). |
| Balance and Stability Limits | The first measurement will be made just before starting treatment, and the second measurement will be made 7 weeks after the start of treatment (at the end of treatment). | 'Funcitonal Reaching Test' will be used to examine the effectiveness of our treatment results on balance and stability limits. In the test, participants are asked to stand in a parallel position near the wall, with their feet shoulder-width apart, make fists with their hands, and flex their shoulders 90 degrees so that they do not touch the wall. The point where the third metacarpal head coincides is recorded as the starting point. He/she is asked to follow the meter fixed to the wall and to reach forward as far as he/she can, so that there is no loss of balance or movement of the feet, and the end point is recorded. It is measured in cm by finding the difference between the starting point and the ending point. The test is repeated 3 times and the average is recorded. This test shows that individuals who cannot reach a distance of 15 cm have a high risk of falling. |
| Gait | The first measurement will be made just before starting treatment, and the second measurement will be made 7 weeks after the start of treatment (at the end of treatment). | ''Timed Up\&Go'' and ''Dual-Task Timed Up\&Go'' test included in the Mini Balance Evaluation System Test will be used to examine the effectiveness of our treatment results on gait. In the test, the patient is expected to get up from the chair, walk a distance of 3 meters, turn around and sit on the chair again. In the dual-task version, participants are asked to count backward by threes.The elapsed time is recorded in seconds. |
| Fall Risk | The first measurement will be made just before starting treatment, and the second measurement will be made 7 weeks after the start of treatment (at the end of treatment). | ''The Modified Falls Efficacy Scale'' will be used to examine the effectiveness of our treatment results on fall risk. The scale is an expanded Fall Activity Scale form that includes items questioning confidence during 4 different outdoor activities. The 14 items on the test (10 indoor and 4 outdoor activities) assess confidence when performing different daily tasks. Items on the scale are scored between 0 (not confident) and 10 (completely confident) to assess participants' self-efficacy levels regarding falls. |
| Upper Extremity Spasticity | The first measurement will be made just before starting treatment, and the second measurement will be made 7 weeks after the start of treatment (at the end of treatment). | Upper extremity spasticity ''Modified Ashworth Scale'' will be used to examine the effectiveness of our treatment results on upper extremity spasticity. The scale is scored from 0 to 5, including the degree (+1). 5 indicates rigidity and 0 indicates no spasticity. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Contacts
STUDY_DIRECTORNilüfer Çetişli Korkmaz, Prof.
Pamukkale University
Outcome results
None listed