Skip to content

Atropine vs Isoprenaline in the Invasive Diagnosis of Arrhythmias

Comparison of the Clinical Utility of Atropine and Isoprenaline in the Invasive Diagnosis of Arrhythmias

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06082388
Enrollment
200
Registered
2023-10-13
Start date
2023-11-09
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2023-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrhythmia, Supraventricular Arrhythmia

Keywords

Electrophysiological study, Atropine, Isoprenaline, Supraventricular arrhythmia, Ablation

Brief summary

During electrophysiological study (EPS) multiple drugs are used to reveal arrhythmias and/or conductive system disorders. Two most often used agents are atropine and isoprenaline. Due to their distinct pharmacological properties, they are affecting myocardium in different manner. Those dissimilarities can affect the EPS course and long-term prognosis. The aim of presented study is to evaluate the optimal protocol of pharmacotherapy during EPS.

Detailed description

Electrophysiological study (EPS) is essential tool for heart rhythm disorders diagnostic. Inducibility of arrhythmia before ablation to confirm the diagnosis and inability to do so after the procedure is crucial for long-term success. Multiple drugs are used to reveal arrhythmias and/or conductive system disorders. Two most often used are atropine and isoprenaline. Atropine is a natural, selective antagonist of cholinergic receptors M1 and M2. It reverses the inhibitory effect of vagal nerve on myocardium. This improves sinus node automatism and conduction in atrioventricular node. Isoprenaline is a preferential agonist of beta-1-adrenergic receptors. It has bathmotropic and chronotropic effect. During daily clinical practice those two drugs are often used interchangeably. However, differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics may affect the results. There are lack of data directly comparing those two agents. There are isolated evidences that arrhythmia inducibility rate after the ablation differs between those two drugs. This may lead to the misconception of ablation as successful. The aim of presented study is to evaluate the optimal protocol of pharmacotherapy during EPS.

Interventions

DRUGComparison of atropine and isoprenaline

Comparison of heart conductive system and arrhythmia inducibility after using atropine or isoprenaline

Sponsors

Medical University of Lodz
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with indication for electrophysiological study according to present guidelines of European Society of Cardiology

Exclusion criteria

* Not willing or incapable to give written informed consent. * Previous diagnosed ventricle tachycardia or fibrillation * Previous diagnosed atrial fibrillation or flutter * Glaucoma (contraindication for atropine)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Long-term success rate12 monthsRecurrence of clinical arrhythmia during 12 months of observation
Evaluation of sinus node recovery timeDuring the procedureSinus node recovery time (ms) during programed atrial stimulation will be assessed to examine the function of sinus node.
Evaluation of anterograde atrioventricular conductionDuring the procedureAnterograde Wenkebach point (ms) and effective refractory period of atrioventricular node (ms) during programed atrial stimulation will be assessed.
Evaluation of retrograde atrioventricular conductionDuring the procedureRetrograde Wenkebach point (ms) and effective refractory period of atrioventricular node (ms) during programed ventricular stimulation will be assessed.
Arrhythmia inducibilityDuring the procedureInducibility of anticipated arrythmia before and after drug administration and after eventual ablation.
Evaluation of sino-atrial conduction timeDuring the procedureSino-atrial conduction time (ms) during programed atrial stimulation will be assessed to examine the function of sinus node.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of adverse events during the 12-month follow up.12 monthsAnalysis of adverse events during the 12-month follow up according to used drug. Adverse events includes: death, stroke, cardiogenic shock, anaphylaxis, myocardial infarction, electric storm.
Length of the procedureDuring the procedureAnalysis of the whole procedure time according to used drug.
Procedure time form drug administration till the end.During the procedureAnalysis of the procedure time form atropine/isoprenaline administration till the end.
Incidence of adverse events during the electrophysiological study.During the procedureAnalysis of adverse events during the electrophysiological study according to used drug. Adverse events includes: death, stroke, cardiogenic shock, anaphylaxis, myocardial infarction, electric storm.

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactKrzysztof Kaczmarek, MD, PhD
krzysztof.kaczmarek@umed.lodz.pl+48 42 201 43 60

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026