Skip to content

A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Sisunatovir in Adults With Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection

AN INTERVENTIONAL PHASE 2/3, ADAPTIVE, MULTI-CENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY TO INVESTIGATE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ORAL SISUNATOVIR COMPARED WITH PLACEBO IN NON-HOSPITALIZED SYMPTOMATIC ADULTS WITH RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS INFECTION WHO ARE AT RISK OF PROGRESSION TO SEVERE ILLNESS

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06079320
Enrollment
16
Registered
2023-10-12
Start date
2023-12-08
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2025-11-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to learn about the safety and effects of sisunatovir. Sisunatovir is studied for the possible treatment of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV). RSV is a virus that causes lung infections with cold-like symptoms, but it can cause severe illness in some people. Sisunatovir is studied in adults: * who are not admitted to the hospital and * who have high chances of having a severe illness from RSV infection. This study is seeking participants who: * Are confirmed to have RSV. * Have symptoms of a lung infection. * Are 18 years of age or older. * Have one or more of the following which increases the chances of RSV illness: * A long-term lung disease. * heart failure. * a condition that weakens the immune system. * Are 65 years of age or older and do not have any of the conditions above Half of the participants in this study will receive sisunatovir. The other half will receive a placebo for 5 days. Placebo looks same like the study medicine but does not have any medication. Both sisunatovir and placebo will be taken by mouth. The study will compare the experiences of people receiving sisunatovir to those of the people who do not. This will help decide if sisunatovir is safe and effective. Participants will attend about 8-10 study visits over 5 weeks. During this time, they will have: * visits at the study clinic, * blood work, * swabs of the nose, * questionnaires, * a follow-up phone call.

Interventions

Participants will receive tablets from Day 1 to Day 5

DRUGPlacebo

Participants will receive matching placebo tablets from Day 1 to Day 5

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants will be assigned to receive study intervention according to the assigned treatment group from the randomization scheme. Investigators will remain blinded to each participant's assigned study intervention until all participants complete treatment.

Intervention model description

This is a Phase 2/ Phase 3, superiority, adaptive, two parallel-arm, randomized, multi-center, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants aged 18 years or older at screening. * Diagnosis of RSV infection collected within 5 days prior to randomization. * New onset or worsening (if present chronically) of at least one of the following signs and/or symptoms consistent with a viral acute respiratory infection (ARI), within 5 days prior to randomization: nasal congestion, nasal discharge, sore throat, cough, sputum production, shortness of breath, or wheezing. * Has at least 1 of the following characteristics or underlying medical conditions: a) 65 years of age or older b) Chronic lung disease, c) Heart failure, d) Immunosuppressive disease/condition or immune-weakening medications

Exclusion criteria

* Any medical or psychiatric condition that may increase the risk of study participation or, in the investigator's judgment, make the participant inappropriate for the study or interfere with the evaluation of response to the study intervention. * Diagnosis of viral respiratory infections other than RSV including influenza and SARS-CoV-2 * Current need for hospitalization or anticipated need for hospitalization for any reason to provide inpatient/acute care within 24 hours after randomization * Any clinically significant ECG abnormality in the pre-dose ECG that, per investigator judgement, may affect participant safety * Has hypersensitivity to or other contraindication to any of the components of the study interventions, as determined by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Related Hospitalization or Death From Any Cause Through Day 28From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28RSV related hospitalization included a specialized acute medical care unit within an assisted living facility or nursing home.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Progression of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) Through Day 10From randomization on Day 1 up to Day 10Progression of LRTI was defined as development of LRTI or transition from non-severe LRTI-RSV at randomization to severe LRTI-RSV at any time up to and including Day 10. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 less than (\<) 95 percent (%) or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.
Number of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Day 10From randomization on Day 1 up to Day 10Development of LRTI was defined as transitioning from not having LRTI at randomization but having nsLRTI-RSV or sLRTI-RSV at any time up to and including Day 10. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.
Number of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Day 15Day 15Resolution of LRTI was defined as transition from RSV-related non-severe LRTI (nsLRTI-RSV) or RSV-related severe LRTI (sLRTI-RSV) at randomization to not having nsLRTI and sLRTI-RSV. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.
Mean Number of Hospital Free Days Through Day 28From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28
Number of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28From randomization on Day 1 up to Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Progression of LRTI was defined as development of LRTI or transition from non severe LRTI-RSV at randomization to severe LRTI-RSV at any time up to and including Days 3, 5, 15 and 28. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.
Number of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28From randomization on Day 1 up to Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Development of LRTI was defined as transitioning from not having LRTI at randomization but having nsLRTI-RSV or sLRTI-RSV at any time up to and including Days 3, 5, 15 and 28. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.
Number of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28At Days 3, 5, 10 and 28Resolution of LRTI was defined as transition from nsLRTI-RSV or sLRTI-RSV at randomization to not having nsLRTI and sLRTI-RSV. LRTI was defined as \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95% or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.
Number of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28At Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Improvement in LRTI status was defined as LRTI resolution or transition from sLRTI-RSV at randomization to nsLRTI-RSV. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.
Number of Participants With RSV-Related Visits (Urgent Care/ Emergency Department (ED)/Hospital) or Death From Any Cause Through Day 28From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28Participants with RSV related visits in a hospital/urgent care or ED requiring no minimum duration of hospitalization were reported in this outcome measure. Investigators determined if a medical visit was related to RSV. RSV-related medical visits were those attendances that would not otherwise occur in the absence of the RSV infection. These may have included: deterioration or decompensation of the lung function that required supplemental oxygen; development of secondary respiratory tract infections that required antibiotic treatment; management of severe symptoms associated with RSV such as fever; worsening or decompensation of cardiac or renal function in participants with underlying cardiac or renal disease.
Mean Number of RSV Related Days in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Through Day 28From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28
Number of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28At Days 5, 10, 15, and 28Improvement was defined as no new acute respiratory infection (ARI) signs or symptoms, and no worsening of existing signs or symptoms compared to the Day 1 visit. At least one sign or symptom (but not all) present at Day 1 was absent, improved or returned to pre-infection status. Resolution was defined as all ARI signs or symptoms were absent or returned to pre-infection status. Clinical response was evaluated by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28At Days 3, 5, 10, 15, and 28Undetectable RSV viral load at a visit was defined as a central PCR laboratory result of target not detected (TND).
Change From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Baseline (within 1 hour post start of study intervention on Day 1) and Days 3, 5, 10, 15, and 28Undetectable viral load was considered to be 0 copies/mL for this analysis.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through Day 35From Day 1 of study intervention up to 28-30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 35)An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An adverse event was considered a TEAE if the event started on or after the study intervention start date (Day 1).
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE) Through Day 35From Day 1 of study intervention up to 28-30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 35)An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the criteria listed below: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or nonpathogenic and other important medical event.
Plasma Concentrations of Sisunatovir at Days 3 and 5Anytime between 3 to 8 hours post dose on Day 3, and pre-dose on Day 5
Mean Number of RSV Related Days in Hospital Through Day 28From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28RSV related hospitalization included a specialized acute medical care unit within an assisted living facility or nursing home.

Countries

China, India, Japan, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 16 participants were enrolled at 16 centers in the United States, China, Japan and India.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sisunatovir
Participants received oral doses of sisunatovir from Day 1 to Day 5.
8
Placebo
Participants received oral doses of placebo from Day 1 to Day 5.
8
Total16

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow up PhaseLost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalSisunatovir
Age, Continuous60.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.13
62.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.88
63.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.96
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants12 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants5 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 84 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Related Hospitalization or Death From Any Cause Through Day 28

RSV related hospitalization included a specialized acute medical care unit within an assisted living facility or nursing home.

Time frame: From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat-Infected (mITT-infected) population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Related Hospitalization or Death From Any Cause Through Day 280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Related Hospitalization or Death From Any Cause Through Day 280 Participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28

Undetectable viral load was considered to be 0 copies/mL for this analysis.

Time frame: Baseline (within 1 hour post start of study intervention on Day 1) and Days 3, 5, 10, 15, and 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SisunatovirChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 5-1.788 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.0327
SisunatovirChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 15-6.110 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.6486
SisunatovirChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 10-4.445 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.5779
SisunatovirChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 28-6.110 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 2.6486
SisunatovirChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 3-1.453 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.2107
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 28-4.900 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.7815
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 3-1.184 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.296
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 5-1.626 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.6493
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 10-2.784 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.8207
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Log10 Transformed Total RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 15-4.900 Log10 copies/mLStandard Deviation 1.7815
Secondary

Mean Number of Hospital Free Days Through Day 28

Time frame: From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SisunatovirMean Number of Hospital Free Days Through Day 2828.0 DaysStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboMean Number of Hospital Free Days Through Day 2828.0 DaysStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Mean Number of RSV Related Days in Hospital Through Day 28

RSV related hospitalization included a specialized acute medical care unit within an assisted living facility or nursing home.

Time frame: From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SisunatovirMean Number of RSV Related Days in Hospital Through Day 280 DaysStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboMean Number of RSV Related Days in Hospital Through Day 280 DaysStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Mean Number of RSV Related Days in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Through Day 28

Time frame: From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SisunatovirMean Number of RSV Related Days in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Through Day 280 DaysStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboMean Number of RSV Related Days in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Through Day 280 DaysStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28

Improvement was defined as no new acute respiratory infection (ARI) signs or symptoms, and no worsening of existing signs or symptoms compared to the Day 1 visit. At least one sign or symptom (but not all) present at Day 1 was absent, improved or returned to pre-infection status. Resolution was defined as all ARI signs or symptoms were absent or returned to pre-infection status. Clinical response was evaluated by the investigator.

Time frame: At Days 5, 10, 15, and 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28Day 53 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28Day 104 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28Day 153 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28Day 283 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28Day 285 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28Day 55 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28Day 155 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With a Clinical Response of Improvement or Resolution at Days 5, 10, 15, and 28Day 105 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Day 10

Development of LRTI was defined as transitioning from not having LRTI at randomization but having nsLRTI-RSV or sLRTI-RSV at any time up to and including Day 10. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.

Time frame: From randomization on Day 1 up to Day 10

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Day 100 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Day 100 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28

Development of LRTI was defined as transitioning from not having LRTI at randomization but having nsLRTI-RSV or sLRTI-RSV at any time up to and including Days 3, 5, 15 and 28. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.

Time frame: From randomization on Day 1 up to Days 3, 5, 15 and 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 30 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 50 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 150 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 150 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Development of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 50 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28

Improvement in LRTI status was defined as LRTI resolution or transition from sLRTI-RSV at randomization to nsLRTI-RSV. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.

Time frame: At Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 51 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 151 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 101 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 282 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 283 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 32 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 52 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 102 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Improvement of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 153 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Progression of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) Through Day 10

Progression of LRTI was defined as development of LRTI or transition from non-severe LRTI-RSV at randomization to severe LRTI-RSV at any time up to and including Day 10. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 less than (\<) 95 percent (%) or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.

Time frame: From randomization on Day 1 up to Day 10

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Progression of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) Through Day 100 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Progression of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI) Through Day 100 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28

Progression of LRTI was defined as development of LRTI or transition from non severe LRTI-RSV at randomization to severe LRTI-RSV at any time up to and including Days 3, 5, 15 and 28. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.

Time frame: From randomization on Day 1 up to Days 3, 5, 15 and 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 30 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 50 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 150 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 150 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Progression of LRTI Through Days 3, 5, 15 and 28Day 50 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Day 15

Resolution of LRTI was defined as transition from RSV-related non-severe LRTI (nsLRTI-RSV) or RSV-related severe LRTI (sLRTI-RSV) at randomization to not having nsLRTI and sLRTI-RSV. LRTI was defined as: \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95 % or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.

Time frame: Day 15

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection. Here Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Day 151 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Day 151 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28

Resolution of LRTI was defined as transition from nsLRTI-RSV or sLRTI-RSV at randomization to not having nsLRTI and sLRTI-RSV. LRTI was defined as \>= 2 lower respiratory signs or symptoms for at least 24 hours including at least 1 lower respiratory sign; or 3 lower respiratory symptoms for at least 24 hours. Lower respiratory symptoms included following: new or increased sputum, new or increased cough, new or increased dyspnea (shortness of breath). Lower respiratory signs included: new or increased wheezing, new or increased crackles/ronchi based on chest auscultation, respiratory rate \>= 20 respirations/minute, low or decreased oxygen saturation (O2 \< 95% or \<= 90% if pre-season baseline is \< 95%), need for new or increased oxygen supplementation.

Time frame: At Days 3, 5, 10 and 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection. Here, Overall Number of Participants Analyzed signifies the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28Day 282 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28Day 51 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28Day 101 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28Day 31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28Day 283 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28Day 31 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28Day 101 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Resolution of LRTI at Days 3, 5, 10 and 28Day 51 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With RSV-Related Visits (Urgent Care/ Emergency Department (ED)/Hospital) or Death From Any Cause Through Day 28

Participants with RSV related visits in a hospital/urgent care or ED requiring no minimum duration of hospitalization were reported in this outcome measure. Investigators determined if a medical visit was related to RSV. RSV-related medical visits were those attendances that would not otherwise occur in the absence of the RSV infection. These may have included: deterioration or decompensation of the lung function that required supplemental oxygen; development of secondary respiratory tract infections that required antibiotic treatment; management of severe symptoms associated with RSV such as fever; worsening or decompensation of cardiac or renal function in participants with underlying cardiac or renal disease.

Time frame: From Day 1 (start of study intervention) up to Day 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With RSV-Related Visits (Urgent Care/ Emergency Department (ED)/Hospital) or Death From Any Cause Through Day 280 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With RSV-Related Visits (Urgent Care/ Emergency Department (ED)/Hospital) or Death From Any Cause Through Day 280 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through Day 35

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. An adverse event was considered a TEAE if the event started on or after the study intervention start date (Day 1).

Time frame: From Day 1 of study intervention up to 28-30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 35)

Population: Safety analysis set (SAS) included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through Day 351 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Through Day 354 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE) Through Day 35

An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, met one or more of the criteria listed below: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, suspected transmission via a Pfizer product of an infectious agent, pathogenic or nonpathogenic and other important medical event.

Time frame: From Day 1 of study intervention up to 28-30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 35)

Population: SAS included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE) Through Day 350 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAE) Through Day 350 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28

Undetectable RSV viral load at a visit was defined as a central PCR laboratory result of target not detected (TND).

Time frame: At Days 3, 5, 10, 15, and 28

Population: mITT-infected population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention, who took at least 1 dose of study intervention, and who had confirmed RSV infection.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 50 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 154 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 101 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 284 Participants
SisunatovirNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 285 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 30 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 51 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 102 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Undetectable RSV Viral Load at Days 3, 5, 10, 15 and 28Day 155 Participants
Secondary

Plasma Concentrations of Sisunatovir at Days 3 and 5

Time frame: Anytime between 3 to 8 hours post dose on Day 3, and pre-dose on Day 5

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) concentration analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of sisunatovir and in whom at least 1 concentration value was reported. Here, Number Analyzed signifies participants evaluable for the specified rows.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SisunatovirPlasma Concentrations of Sisunatovir at Days 3 and 5Day 398.26 Nanogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 141.41
SisunatovirPlasma Concentrations of Sisunatovir at Days 3 and 5Day 5173.1 Nanogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 231.83

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026