Skip to content

Vascular Closure With a Device Compared to Manual Compression After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The LockeT II Study

Vascular Closure With Novel Ergonomic External Compression Device Compared to Manual Compression After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The LockeT II Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06078735
Enrollment
110
Registered
2023-10-12
Start date
2023-10-02
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2024-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Hemostasis

Brief summary

The LockeT II study is a single center, prospective randomized study. It is intended to study the effectiveness of using LockeT device to gain hemostasis after venous procedures as compared to Manual Compression (MC). Approximately 110 patients will be enrolled.

Detailed description

The volume of catheter ablation procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias are on the rise in the United States and worldwide. Despite decrease in complication rates due to refinement in ablation tools and techniques, achieving vascular hemostasis following large-bore sheath femoral access remains a challenge. Thus, MC remains the current standard of care. However, MC requires up to 8 hours of prolonged bedrest, which is associated with longer length of stay and complications from indwelling catheters. Another method of vascular closure is the figure-of-eight (FoE) stitch - a subcutaneous suture that has been evaluated to achieve homeostasis following major cardiovascular procedures. In recent years, invasive, vascular closure devices have become popular. However, results continue to suggest that the risk versus benefit has not been definitively demonstrated. Instead, the LockeT is a new suture retention device designed to closely mimic manual compression by distributing the tension of a FoE stitch over a larger surface area. In such a way, patients can have the benefits of MC without a healthcare professional to stand bedside.

Interventions

DEVICEVascular closure with LockeT device

For subjects that are assigned to the LockeT device arm, the healthcare professional will place the LockeT with suture above the wound to achieve compression instead of manually holding pressure on the sutures. After hemostasis is achieved and prior to ambulation the LockeT will be removed followed by suture removal.

Sponsors

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will be randomized 1:1 to LockeT device or Manual Compression.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Must be at least 18 years of age * Be able to provide consent * Presenting for planned procedures that require percutaneous venous punctures, such as atrial fibrillation radiofrequency ablation, and where the physician utilizes a LockeT device or MC to close the wound.

Exclusion criteria

* Under the age of 18 * Unable to or unwilling to provide consent * Cannot comply with study requirements * Not undergoing procedures that require a percutaneous venous puncture or planned access to the left atrium and/or ventricle * Subjects whose physician does not use LockeT or MC to close the venous puncture. * Patient is currently pregnant, as evidenced by positive urine Beta-HCG. (Urine Beta Human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) will be checked in all females of the reproductive age group). * If the physician detects a formed hematoma prior to venous closure, that patient will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness of using the LockeT suture retention device2 DaysEffectiveness of using the LockeT suture retention device to gain hemostasis after venous procedures as compared to standard Manual Compression (MC) will be assessed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient, physician, and nursing staff benefits2 DaysPatient, physician, and nursing staff benefits of the LockeT device will be assessed via LockeT device questionnaire with a scale of 1 to 5, 1 strongly disagree and 5 strongly agree.
Patient discomfort with Locket device2 DaysPain discomfort will be assessed via Locket device questionnaire with a scale of 1 to 5, 1 strongly disagree and 5 strongly agree.
Incidence of hematoma/ecchymosis2 DaysThe incidence of hematoma/ecchymosis post-procedure will be assessed.
Safety of LockeT device2 DaysSafety of LockeT device will be assessed by the incidence of adverse events, including but not limited to: vascular complications, like atrioventricular (AV) fistula, retroperitoneal bleed, surgical exploration of the groin (thrombin injection, open surgery or ligation); need for blood transfusion, defined as a 2 gm post-procedure drop in hemoglobin, or symptoms of anemia,).
Comparison of Manual Compression labor cost and Locket device cost2 DaysManual Compression labor cost and Locket device cost will be compared

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDonita Atkins
Datkins@kchrf.com816-651-1969

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026