Skip to content

A Study of Intismeran Autogene (V940) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) Versus Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab in Participants With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (V940-002)

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo- and Active-Comparator-Controlled Clinical Study of Adjuvant V940 (mRNA-4157) Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Adjuvant Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab in Participants With Resected Stage II, IIIA, IIIB (N2) Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (INTerpath-002)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06077760
Acronym
INTerpath-002
Enrollment
868
Registered
2023-10-11
Start date
2023-12-06
Completion date
2035-12-21
Last updated
2026-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate intismeran autogene plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab for the adjuvant treatment of margin negative, completely resected Stage II, IIIA, IIIB (with nodal involvement \[N2\]) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary hypothesis is that intismeran autogene plus pembrolizumab is superior to placebo plus pembrolizumab with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) as assessed by the investigator.

Interventions

IM injection

BIOLOGICALPembrolizumab

IV infusion

OTHERPlacebo

IM injection

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
ModernaTX, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The main inclusion criteria include but are not limited to the following: * Has undergone margin negative, completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and has pathological Stage II, IIIA, IIIB (N2) squamous or nonsquamous tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging per American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Eighth Edition guidelines. * Has no evidence of disease before randomization. * Has received at least one dose of adjuvant treatment with standard of care platinum doublet chemotherapy. * No more than 24 weeks have elapsed between surgical resection of curative intent and the first dose of pembrolizumab. * Participants who are hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive are eligible if they have received hepatitis B virus (HBV) antiviral therapy for at least 4 weeks and have undetectable HBV viral load prior to randomization. * Participants with history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are eligible if HCV viral load is undetectable at screening. * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected participants must have well controlled HIV on anti-retroviral therapy (ART).

Exclusion criteria

The main

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disease- Free Survival (DFS)Up to ~78 monthsDFS is defined as the time from randomization to any recurrence (local, locoregional, regional or distant), occurrence of new primary NSCLC, as assessed by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Up to ~12 yearsOS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause.
Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS)Up to ~12 yearsDMFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first diagnosis of a distant metastasis as assessed by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Lung Cancer Specific Survival (LCSS)Up to ~12 yearsLCSS is defined as the time from randomization to death due to lung cancer.
Change from Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (Items 29 and 30) Combined ScoreBaseline and up to ~12 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" and "How would you rate your overall quality of life during the past week?" will be scored on a 7-point scale (1= Very poor to 7=Excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores will be standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better overall health status. The change from baseline in global health status/quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 29 and 30) combined score will be presented.
Change from Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning (Items 1-5) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline and up to ~12 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to 5 questions about their physical functioning will be scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores will be standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a worse level of physical functioning. The change from baseline in physical functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 1-5) combined score will be presented.
Change from Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Role Functioning (Items 6 and 7) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline and up to ~12 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the questions "Were you limited in doing either your work or other daily activities during the past week?" and " Were you limited in pursuing your hobbies or other leisure time activities during the past week?" will be scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores will be standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a worse level of role functioning. The change from baseline in role functioning (EORTC QLQ-C30 Items 6 and 7) combined score will be presented.
Change from Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Dyspnea (Item 8) Score on the EORTC QLQ-C30Baseline and up to ~12 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. Participant responses to the question "Were you short of breath?" will be scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores will be standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a worse level of dyspnea. The change from baseline in dyspnea (EORTC QLQ-C30 Item 8) score will be presented.
Change from Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer Questionnaire (LC24) Coughing (Items 31 and 52) Combined Score on the EORTC QLQ-LC24Baseline and up to ~12 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-LC24 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality of life questionnaire. Participant responses to questions about coughing will be scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores will be standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates more coughing. The change from baseline in coughing (EORTC QLQ-LC24 Items 31 and 52) combined score will be presented.
Change from Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-LC24 Chest Pain (Item 40) Score on the EORTC QLQ-LC24Baseline and up to ~12 yearsThe EORTC QLQ-LC24 is a lung cancer specific health-related quality of life questionnaire. Participant responses to the question "Have you had pain in your chest?" will be scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Using linear transformation, raw scores will be standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates more chest pain. The change from baseline in chest pain (EORTC QLQ-LC24 Item 40) score will be presented.
Number of Participants Who Experience an Adverse Event (AE)Up to ~15 monthsAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.
Number of Participants Who Discontinue Study Treatment Due to an AEUp to ~12 monthsAn AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORMedical Director

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026