Skip to content

Comparative Analysis of AI Software for Enhanced Polyp Detection and Diagnosis

Comparative Analysis of AI Software and Conventional Colonoscopy for Enhanced Polyp Detection and Diagnosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06077435
Enrollment
915
Registered
2023-10-11
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
2026-06-01
Last updated
2025-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonic Polyp, Colon Lesion

Brief summary

Purpose & Research Questions The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) improves the detection of polyps and whether the system can classify the type and severity of detected changes. The investigators will also assess if there are any differences between the various AI systems and whether the polyps that may be missed are benign or malignant.

Detailed description

Materials: Selection, Representativeness, and Grouping The study is a randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at Västra Götaland region. Patients are randomized to receive either AI or conventional endoscopy, and each endoscopy unit has access to at least one AI device. Informed consent is obtained from patients before the examination. Before the examination, patients are asked if they want to participate in the study. If the patient wishes to participate, informed consent is obtained. The endoscopist then draws a slip from an envelope, determining whether conventional colonoscopy or AI will be used. During conventional colonoscopy, the patient is examined according to routine practice. After the examination, a questionnaire is filled out, recording various findings from the examination. During AI examinations, the AI system is activated only during instrument withdrawal. The system identifies polyps and alerts the endoscopist. Additionally, two of the AI systems (GI-Genius, CADEYE) have the ability to characterize the detected polyps and provide an interpretation of whether the changes are benign or malignant. After the examination, a similar questionnaire is completed as in conventional colonoscopy. Method: Data Collection Basic data will be recorded, including the reason for the examination, other illnesses, medications, demographic data such as gender, age, family history of cancer, and the time of the examination (morning or afternoon). During the examination, the following will be recorded: the number of polyps, macroscopic classification of polyps, AI system's characterization of the polyps, bowel cleansing quality, laxative method, medication during the examination, complications occurring during or after the examination. Withdrawal time is recorded, as well as the number of false-positive polyps and supplementation with histological data of polyps after review by the pathologist. All materials and costs associated with the examination are recorded. Three different AI systems will be used at the various hospital sites, namely EndoAid (Olympus), CADEYE (Fujinon), and GI-Genius (Medtronic). All units will randomize each examination to either AI or non-AI.

Interventions

DEVICEAI

AI system

Sponsors

Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 50 years * Elective colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* Patient declines to participate in the study. * Age \< 50 years * Unprepared bowel

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To compare the effectiveness of AI systems in characterizing polyps with conventional histologyDuring procedure (5minutes)The endoscopist's ability to characterize lesions with and without AI will be assessed, and this assessment will be compared to histology
Comparison of Adenoma Detection Rates (ADR) between colonoscopies assisted by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and conventional colonoscopies without AIDuring procedure (up to 40 minutes)The ADR is typically expressed as a percentage and is calculated using the following formula:Number of colonoscopies with adenoma detection/ Total number of colonoscopies ×100.
To assess and compare the costs associated with AI-assisted colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy.During procedure (5minutes)Each cost associated with each examination, whether using AI-assisted or conventional colonoscopy, will be recorded prospectively.

Countries

Sweden

Contacts

Primary ContactJonas Varkey, MD, PhD
jonas.varkey@vgregion.se0046764030388

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026