Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Conditions
Keywords
lumbar stenosis, sagittal imbalance, minimally invasive decompression surgery
Brief summary
From adulthood onwards, the aging process manifests itself in the spine through loss of disc height and kyphotic deformity. As the general population ages, the prevalence of lumbar degenerative diseases and sagittal imbalance increases. Sagittal balance is a physiological alignment resulting from the effective muscular and ligamentary forces that place patients' heads harmoniously in line with their pelvis. Roussouly first classified this alignment by differentiating four types of balance in an asymptomatic population. He established a link between the varieties of sagittal balance of the spine, the sacral slope and the position of the pelvis in space. He went on to explain sagittal imbalance in the aging population suffering from degenerative diseases. One of the most common lumbar degenerative diseases is lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal is frequently associated with sagittal imbalance of the spine. Lumbar canal stenosis causes lumbar pain, leg pain, neurogenic intermittent claudication and bladder and rectal disorders. The severity of clinical symptoms increases linearly with progressive sagittal imbalance \[8\]. We represent the sagittal imbalance of the spine by a positive sagittal vertical axis (SVA) presented by patients to reduce the pressure exerted by the yellow ligament, which is hypertrophied in degenerative disease . Many have shown that this forward-flexing posture can be improved by simple decompression, and that this deformity corresponds to an analgesic position and not to a structural deformity. Little is known about the factors that influence alignment after lumbar canal decompression and short segment fusion. This study therefore aims to elucidate some of the clinical and radiological factors likely to affect postoperative sagittal balance in patients undergoing simple minimally invasive decompression surgery and short segment fusion (1 or 2 levels).
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Study design
Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Inclusion criteria
* Patient age ≥ 18 years * French-speaking patients * Patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar decompression with or without one- or two-level arthrodesis * Patients with preoperative sagittal imbalance measured on EOS images (sagittal vertebral axis \> 50 mm)
Exclusion criteria
* Patients under guardianship or curatorship * Patient deprived of liberty * Patient under court protection * Patient objecting to the use of his or her data for this study * Revision surgery
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evolution of sagittal balance after minimally invasive decompression surgery | 3 months | Sagittal Vertebral axis mesurement before and after surgery |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| lumbar lordosis | 3 months | mesurement of the lumbar lordosis before and after surgery |
| pelvic incidence | 3 months | mesurement of the pelvic incidence before and after surgery |
| barrey Ratio | 3 months | mesurement of the Barrey Ratio before and after surgery |
| sacred gradient | 3 months | mesurement of the sacred version before and after surgery |
| thoracic kyphosis | 3 months | mesurement of the thoracic kyphosis before and after surgery |
| pelvic version | 3 months | mesurement of the pelvic version before and after surgery |
Countries
France
Contacts
Primary ContactPierre Emmanuel Moreau, MD
Backup ContactHélène Beaussier, pharmaD, phD
Outcome results
None listed