Skip to content

Improving Thoracic Surgical Care Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes (ePROS)

Improving Thoracic Surgical Care Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes (ePROS)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06075316
Enrollment
200
Registered
2023-10-10
Start date
2023-11-14
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thoracic

Keywords

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome, Patient-Reported Outcome, thoracic surgery, complications

Brief summary

This is a single-site, non-randomized study on the outcomes of remote real-time "ePRO monitoring" in thoracic surgery patients. ePRO monitoring is a health information technology intervention comprised of delivering longitudinal electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) surveys (e.g., on symptoms, and physical functioning) coupled with automated provider alerts for concerning survey responses.

Detailed description

Thoracic surgery patients are at high risk for severe complications post-surgery, such as respiratory failure, empyema, wound problems, and even mortality. Patients with complications may need readmission and invasive management. Usual care may not capture the symptoms of surgery complications. Well-designed remote monitoring of postoperative patients may enable early intervention and lower the risk of severe complications. This study evaluates the implementation and effectiveness of perioperative electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) monitoring in thoracic surgery patients. Previous studies demonstrated the feasibility of ePROs monitoring by thoracic surgery patients and providers. This study will explore barriers to implementation before real-world effectiveness studies.

Interventions

Alerts will be sent to providers via email and/or the electronic medical record at pre-specified response thresholds. Providers will be instructed to respond to and document the management of alerts per their clinical routine.

Sponsors

UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The participants will have their alerts sent to the clinicians when concerning symptoms are reported.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients participating in ePRO monitoring must meet the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study: 1. 18 years or older 2. English or Spanish speaking 3. Able to complete a web-based, telephonic (IVR), or CRA (or other IRB-approved research team member)-administrated symptom survey 4. Planned to undergo major thoracic surgery (involving chest wall incisions and overnight admission) 5. Discharged from the thoracic surgery service 6. Discharged to home

Exclusion criteria

All patients meeting any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reach of ePRO monitoringMonths 4 through 6 after implementation of the studyPercentage of eligible thoracic surgery patients enrolling in ePRO monitoring.
Adoption of ePRO monitoringMonths 4 through 6 after implementation of the studyPercentage of ePRO monitoring alerts sent that result in clinical action by providers within 1 week of delivery
Patient-level UptakeMonths 4 through 6 after implementation of the studythe percentage of enrolled patients who participate in \>=1 ePRO survey.
Overall Reach of ePRO monitoringEnd of studyPercentage of eligible thoracic surgery patients enrolling in ePRO monitoring.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complication RateBaseline through 30 days post-dischargePercentage of participants with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade \>=3)
Emergency department visit at 30 daysBaseline through 30 days post-dischargePercentage of participants with an emergency department visit
Emergency department visit at 90 daysBaseline through 90 days post-dischargePercentage of participants with an emergency department visit
Readmission at 30 daysBaseline through 30 days post-dischargePercentage participants readmitted to a hospital
Readmission at 90 daysBaseline through 90 days post-dischargePercentage participants readmitted to a hospital
Mortality at 30 daysBaseline through 30 daysPercentage participants who died
Mortality at 90 daysBaseline through 90 daysPercentage participants who died
Patient Alert RateBaseline through 90 daysPercentage of all patients who trigger at least 1 alert.
Alert RateBaseline through 90 daysPercentage of all ePRO surveys that trigger an alert

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTAmanda Gentry
Amanda_gentry@med.unc.edu(336) 655-7743
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORGita Mody, MD, MPH

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 17, 2026