Skip to content

EMG-guided Botox Injection Versus Conventional Botox Injection in Gummy Smile Patients

EMG-guided Botox Injection Versus Conventional Injection in Yonsei Point in Gummy Smile Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06075134
Enrollment
32
Registered
2023-10-10
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
2026-08-01
Last updated
2026-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Excessive Gingival Display

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effect of EMG-guided Botox injection with conventional Botox injection in Yonsei point, in patients with excessive gingival display. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does the use of electromyography (EMG) as a guide during Botox injection for patients with gummy smile has better effect than conventional injection in Yonsei point? Participants will be randomized in equal proportions between intervention and control groups. * Preoperative assessment of amount of gingival display, lip length (philtrum and vermilion length), and smile type. * For the intervention group, EMG readings will be done in Clinical Neurophysiology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital EMG-guided Botox injection (Intervention group). Conventional Botox injection in Yonsei point (Control group).

Interventions

Botox injection

DEVICEEMG

Quantitative Electromyography

To increase efficacy of Botox

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with excessive gingival display. * Patients with esthetic concerns. * Patients with mild to moderate VME (vertical maxillary excess). * Normal clinical crown dimensions. * Patients aged 18 to 50. * Systemically healthy patients. * Non-smokers.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with severe VME (vertical maxillary excess). * Pregnant and breastfeeding women. * Patients with gingival inflammation and/or enlargement. * Inflammation or infection at the site of injection. * Patients with known allergy to any of the components of Botox (i.e., saline, human albumin, lactose and sodium succinate). * Patients using anticholinesterase or other agents affecting neuromuscular transmission. * Psychologically unstable patients or those who have unrealistic expectations and questionable motives. * Patients with neuromuscular disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in amount of gingival displayBaseline, One-week, One-month, three-months, and six-months follow-upWill be measured using ruler in mm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantitative EMGBaseline, One-week and six-months follow-upWill be measured using EMG in mv.
Patient satisfactionBaseline, One-week, One-month, three-months, and six-months follow-upWill be assessed using questionnaire, on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 is completely not satisfied and 5 is completely satisfied.
Post-operative painBaseline, One-week, and One-month follow-upWill be measured using visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10.
Smile typeBaseline, One-week, One-month, three-months, and six-months follow-upQualitative, by Rubin (1974). Smile is classified into 1. Corner of the mouth (Mona Lisa) smile, 2. Canine Smile, and 3. Full denture smile
Change in lip lengthBaseline, One-week, One-month, three-months, and six-months follow-upWill be measured using UNC (University of North Carolina) -15 periodontal probe in mm.
Esthetics (Symmetry) for operatorsBaseline, One-week, One-month, three-months, and six-months follow-upWill be measured using 5-point Likert scale, where 1 is significantly asymmetrical and 5 is completely symmetrical.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTSherry Fayez Akhnokh, BSc
sherry.akhnokh@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+0201284857175
CONTACTNesma Shemais, PhD
nesma.shemais@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSherry Fayez Akhnokh, BSc

Cairo University

STUDY_DIRECTORNoha Ghallab, PhD

Cairo University

STUDY_CHAIRNesma Shemais, PhD

Cairo University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026