Skip to content

Psychometric Testing: Cued vs. Learned Suppression

Psychometric Testing: Cued vs. Learned Suppression

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06074523
Enrollment
75
Registered
2023-10-10
Start date
2022-11-02
Completion date
2023-03-10
Last updated
2025-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

attention

Brief summary

In this line of research, the researchers are examining whether performance on a cued attentional suppression (ignoring) task is related to performance on a learned attentional suppression task. In addition, these measures are related to the capacity of working memory and every day inattentive traits.

Detailed description

This is a behavioral study. The researchers will measures performance on multiple tasks. 1) a cued attentional suppression task, where participants are told the color of the item they are supposed to ignore on each trial. 2) a learned attentional suppression task, where participants learn over experience that a particular color is not the target. 3) a visual working memory capacity measurement 4) an inattentive trait report task, where participants report their experiences of inattention during their daily lives.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBehavioral Measurement and self-report

Measurements of behavioral performance and self-report

Sponsors

Lehigh University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Within-subjects measures, correlational analysis

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity, normal color vision

Exclusion criteria

* age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Button Press Reaction Time1 dayReaction times on visual search task with positive, negative, and neutral cues
Learned Suppression Task1 dayReaction times on visual search task no salient distractor and learned salient distractor
Visual Working Memory Capacity1 dayVisual Working Memory Capacity- Change Localization; Estimate of number of items maintained in working memory
Inattentive Traits Subscale of Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self Report Scale1 dayAdult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self Report Scale (used on healthy adults), Inattentive Traits subscale. Higher values indicate more ADHD-like inattentive trait symptoms (0-45).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Attention and Working Memory Tests
All participants will complete a series of behavioral tasks, including cued visual search with positive (target color), negative (distractor color) and neutral (baseline) cues, learned visual search with a repeated salient distractor color, a visual working memory capacity task, and a daily life inattentive traits questionnaire (self-report). Single Arm. Behavioral Measurement and self-report: Measurements of behavioral performance and self-report
75
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall Studymissing data in one condition, participant failed to fill out all data forms9
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAttention and Working Memory Tests
Age, Continuous19.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.15
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
56 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
75 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 75
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Button Press Reaction Time

Reaction times on visual search task with positive, negative, and neutral cues

Time frame: 1 day

Population: 21 participants were excluded for either bad accuracy in one of the cognitive tasks (n = 11) or for incomplete data recording (n = 10).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Attention and Working Memory TestsButton Press Reaction TimeNeutral Condition1.86 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.77
Attention and Working Memory TestsButton Press Reaction TimeNegative Condition1.53 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.57
Attention and Working Memory TestsButton Press Reaction TimePositive Condition1.29 SecondsStandard Deviation 0.49
Comparison: Comparing Cued Suppression Task; Positive, Negative, and Neutral Cue condtionsp-value: <0.001ANOVA
Primary

Inattentive Traits Subscale of Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self Report Scale

Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self Report Scale (used on healthy adults), Inattentive Traits subscale. Higher values indicate more ADHD-like inattentive trait symptoms (0-45).

Time frame: 1 day

Population: 21 participants were excluded for either bad accuracy in one of the cognitive tasks (n = 11) or for incomplete data recording (n = 10).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Attention and Working Memory TestsInattentive Traits Subscale of Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self Report Scale18.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Comparison: Correlation of Inattentive Traits subscale and learned suppression (difference in RT between target absent and target present trials)p-value: 0.04695% CI: [-0.5015, -0.002414]correlation
Primary

Learned Suppression Task

Reaction times on visual search task no salient distractor and learned salient distractor

Time frame: 1 day

Population: 21 participants were excluded for either bad accuracy in one of the cognitive tasks (n = 11) or for incomplete data recording (n = 10).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Attention and Working Memory TestsLearned Suppression TaskSingleton Absent condition1.014 Reaction time (seconds)Standard Deviation 0.315
Attention and Working Memory TestsLearned Suppression TaskSingleton Present condition1.001 Reaction time (seconds)Standard Deviation 0.294
Comparison: Comparing performance on target absent and target present trialsp-value: 0.08t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Visual Working Memory Capacity

Visual Working Memory Capacity- Change Localization; Estimate of number of items maintained in working memory

Time frame: 1 day

Population: 21 participants were excluded for either bad accuracy in one of the cognitive tasks (n = 11) or for incomplete data recording (n = 10).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Attention and Working Memory TestsVisual Working Memory Capacity2.85 Number of items rememberedStandard Deviation 0.7
Comparison: Relationship between Cued Attention Negative Cue Benefit (Neutral Cue RT- Negative Cue RT) and working memory capacity.p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-0.5803, -0.1135]correlation

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026