Skip to content

PRogrammed Versus Modified Natural Cycle After Euploid Failed Embryo Transfer

PREFER: PRogrammed Versus Modified Natural Cycle After Euploid Failed Embryo Transfer: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06074055
Acronym
PREFER
Enrollment
9
Registered
2023-10-10
Start date
2023-10-25
Completion date
2024-10-21
Last updated
2025-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility, Female

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare frozen embryo transfer protocols in patients undergoing a second frozen embryo transfer (FET) after a unsuccessful first programmed FET cycle as a possible treatment for people undergoing infertility treatment. The purpose of this research study is to: * Determine if there is a difference between FET protocols in patients who require a second FET cycle. * Investigate if switching the FET protocol after a failed programmed cycle is beneficial for patients undergoing a second FET cycle. * Examine pregnancy outcomes including obstetrical and neonatal outcomes (if applicable) * Obtain uterine flexibility/stiffness measurements via transvaginal ultrasound prior to the embryo transfer procedure. This is called shear wave elastography. Participants will be randomized in their second FET transfer attempt to either another programmed protocol or a modified natural protocol.

Detailed description

This research study is studying if there is a difference in frozen embryo transfer protocols used (modified natural versus programmed) after a failed first programmed FET cycle, defined as either a negative pregnancy test or a biochemical loss, as a possible treatment for people undergoing infertility treatment and in vitro fertilization (IVF). Participants will be randomized, in a 1:1 ratio, in their second FET transfer attempt to either another programmed protocol or a modified natural protocol. Once randomized, participants will undergo routine FET monitoring based on their randomization allocation, transfer procedure and pregnancy monitoring as applicable. Additional ultrasound images will be obtained prior to the transfer procedure to assess the stiffness or flexibility of the uterus, called shear wave elastography. A participant blood sample and infant buccal swab will be collected for future research studies.

Interventions

OTHERFET Protocol

Participants are randomized to either another programmed FET Protocol vs. a modified natural FET protocol

Sponsors

Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 53 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Major Inclusion Criteria: The following are major inclusion criteria: 1. Patients planning to undergo frozen embryo transfer cycle with a single euploid blastocyst. 2. Patients who have previously undergone their first unsuccessful frozen embryo transfer cycle, defined as either failure of implantation with negative pregnancy test or biochemical pregnancy, using a programmed cycle protocol. 3. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) of the embryo used in failed programmed embryo transfer cycle must have occurred after January 1, 2017. 4. Patients ages 18 to 53 years old as per practice guidelines. 5. Patients with BMI between 16-45 kg/m2. 6. Patients with at least one embryo remaining in storage, from either the same or a separate cohort. 7. Patients with proven ovulatory function, as defined by the presence of regular menstrual cycles or detection of luteinizing hormone surge on serum or urinary test kits. 8. Patients with ≥ 7 mm endometrial thickness prior to progesterone start in prior transfer cycle. 9. Normal uterine cavity as evidenced by recent (within 1 year) saline sonogram or hysteroscopy. Major

Exclusion criteria

The following are

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained implantation rateapproximately 6 weeks after embryo transferpresence of an intrauterine clinical pregnancy with fetal heart tones at 8 weeks gestational age

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biochemical pregnancy loss ratetypically 1 month post initial bHCG testserum bHCG level ≥ 5 milli-International unit (mIU/mL) after FET without any ultrasound evidence of pregnancy until serum bHCG is \< 5 mIU/mL
Clinical Pregnancy Rateapproximately 10 days after initial pregnancy testpresence of an intrauterine gestational sac
Clinical Pregnancy Loss Rateapproximately 2 months after FET procedurea pregnancy after FET that had at minimum ultrasound evidence of a gestational sac, but did not progress to a live birth and was not terminated nor was an ectopic pregnancy.
Live Birth Rateapproximately 16-32 weeks post discharge at 8 weeks gestational agedelivery of a live born infant greater than 24 weeks gestational age.
Biochemical Pregnancy Rateapproximately 9 days after transferBiochemical (positive serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (bHCG) post transfer procedure)
Rate of maternal obstetrical outcomes and complicationsapproximately 40 weeks gestationmode of delivery, placental issues, preterm delivery
Rate of neonatal outcomes and complicationsapproximately 40 weeks gestational age or after delivery of infantgestational age at delivery, birth weight, any complications
Elastography Dataprior to the embryo transfer procedureshear wave elastography measurements of the uterus
Rate of pregnancies of undetermined location and ectopic pregnanciesapproximately 1-2 months post initial bHCGPregnancies that are not intrauterine

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026