Chronic Insomnia, Older Adults, Sleep Hygiene
Conditions
Keywords
Brief Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia, Chronic Insomnia, Older adults, Sleep Hygiene
Brief summary
This study aims to investigate whether a four-week BBTi program can effectively improve chronic insomnia and reduce overall stress in middle-aged and elderly individuals.
Detailed description
This study will be conducted a single-group pre-test and post-test design, aiming to recruit 80 subjects who will undergo a four-week BBTi intervention. Participants will be selected from sleep counseling patients referred by sleep specialists. Inclusion criteria include: 1) individuals aged 40 years and above; 2) experiencing sleep disturbances; 3) willing to participate in the research project and provide informed consent. Cognitive impairment will exclude. The intervention consists of four weeks of BBTi. During the first week, participants will receive face-to-face sleep assessments and sleep hygiene education. In the second week, a phone interview will be conducted to assess the patient's progress and provide appropriate relaxation techniques. Unsatisfactory responses to sleep restriction therapy or stimulation control methods will be addressed through face-to-face interviews in the third week. The fourth week will involve an overall review and evaluation conducted via a telephone interview.
Interventions
The intervention consists of four weeks of BBTi. During the first week, participants will receive face-to-face sleep assessments and sleep hygiene education. In the second week, a phone interview will be conducted to assess the patient's progress and provide appropriate relaxation techniques. Unsatisfactory responses to sleep restriction therapy or stimulation control methods will be addressed through face-to-face interviews in the third week. The fourth week will involve an overall review and evaluation conducted via a telephone interview.
Sponsors
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* individuals aged 40 years and above, * experiencing sleep disturbances, * willing to participate in the research project and provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
●Cognitive impairment
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Insomnia severity (T1) | the first week | The investigators collected the insomnia severity from participants: The Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) comprises seven items. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 points, and total scores are ranged 0-28 points. A higher total score indicates a higher severity of insomnia. Specifically, a score ranging from 0 to 7 indicates no significant insomnia issues, while a score of 8 to 14 signifies mild sleep difficulties. An ISI score falling within the range of 15 to 21 reflects moderate insomnia, and a score of 22 to 28 indicates severe insomnia. |
| Insomnia severity (T2) | the second week | The investigators collected the insomnia severity from participants: The Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) comprises seven items. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 points, and total scores are ranged 0-28 points. A higher total score indicates a higher severity of insomnia. Specifically, a score ranging from 0 to 7 indicates no significant insomnia issues, while a score of 8 to 14 signifies mild sleep difficulties. An ISI score falling within the range of 15 to 21 reflects moderate insomnia, and a score of 22 to 28 indicates severe insomnia. |
| Insomnia severity (T3) | the third week | The investigators collected the insomnia severity from participants: The Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) comprises seven items. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 points, and total scores are ranged 0-28 points. A higher total score indicates a higher severity of insomnia. Specifically, a score ranging from 0 to 7 indicates no significant insomnia issues, while a score of 8 to 14 signifies mild sleep difficulties. An ISI score falling within the range of 15 to 21 reflects moderate insomnia, and a score of 22 to 28 indicates severe insomnia. |
| Insomnia severity (T4) | the fourth week | The investigators collected the insomnia severity from participants: The Insomnia Severity Scale (ISI) comprises seven items. Each question is scored on a scale of 0 to 4 points, and total scores are ranged 0-28 points. A higher total score indicates a higher severity of insomnia. Specifically, a score ranging from 0 to 7 indicates no significant insomnia issues, while a score of 8 to 14 signifies mild sleep difficulties. An ISI score falling within the range of 15 to 21 reflects moderate insomnia, and a score of 22 to 28 indicates severe insomnia. |
| Sleep health (T1) | the first week | The researchers collected data using the Regulatory Satisfaction Alertness Timing Efficiency Duration (RU-SATED) questionnaire from the participants. The RU-SATED questionnaire consists of six questions, each evaluating distinct facets of sleep health. These questions encompass aspects such as sleep regularity, sleep satisfaction, daytime alertness, sleep timing, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points, resulting in a total score that ranges from 0 to 12 points. A higher total score across these six questions indicates a greater level of sleep health. |
| Sleep health (T2) | the second week | The researchers collected data using the Regulatory Satisfaction Alertness Timing Efficiency Duration (RU-SATED) questionnaire from the participants. The RU-SATED questionnaire consists of six questions, each evaluating distinct facets of sleep health. These questions encompass aspects such as sleep regularity, sleep satisfaction, daytime alertness, sleep timing, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points, resulting in a total score that ranges from 0 to 12 points. A higher total score across these six questions indicates a greater level of sleep health. |
| Sleep health (T3) | the third week | The researchers collected data using the Regulatory Satisfaction Alertness Timing Efficiency Duration (RU-SATED) questionnaire from the participants. The RU-SATED questionnaire consists of six questions, each evaluating distinct facets of sleep health. These questions encompass aspects such as sleep regularity, sleep satisfaction, daytime alertness, sleep timing, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points, resulting in a total score that ranges from 0 to 12 points. A higher total score across these six questions indicates a greater level of sleep health. |
| Sleep health (T4) | the fourth week | The researchers collected data using the Regulatory Satisfaction Alertness Timing Efficiency Duration (RU-SATED) questionnaire from the participants. The RU-SATED questionnaire consists of six questions, each evaluating distinct facets of sleep health. These questions encompass aspects such as sleep regularity, sleep satisfaction, daytime alertness, sleep timing, sleep efficiency, and sleep duration. Each question is rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points, resulting in a total score that ranges from 0 to 12 points. A higher total score across these six questions indicates a greater level of sleep health. |
| Sleep Diary_Sleep efficacy (%) (T1) | the first week | The researchers obtained sleep diaries from the participants. The sleep diary is a subjective record in which subjects document their sleep patterns. The following aspects can be assessed through the sleep diary: Total Sleep Time (TST):Calculated as the time elapsed from the moment of waking to the time of falling asleep. Sleep Efficiency: The ratio of total sleep time (TST) to time in bed (TIB) (multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage) |
| Sleep Diary_Sleep efficacy (%) (T2) | the second week | The researchers obtained sleep diaries from the participants. The sleep diary is a subjective record in which subjects document their sleep patterns. The following aspects can be assessed through the sleep diary: Total Sleep Time (TST):Calculated as the time elapsed from the moment of waking to the time of falling asleep. Sleep Efficiency: The ratio of total sleep time (TST) to time in bed (TIB) (multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage) |
| Sleep Diary_Sleep efficacy (%) (T3) | the third week | The researchers obtained sleep diaries from the participants. The sleep diary is a subjective record in which subjects document their sleep patterns. The following aspects can be assessed through the sleep diary: Total Sleep Time (TST):Calculated as the time elapsed from the moment of waking to the time of falling asleep. Sleep Efficiency: The ratio of total sleep time (TST) to time in bed (TIB) (multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage) |
| Sleep Diary_Sleep efficacy (%) (T4) | the fourth week | The researchers obtained sleep diaries from the participants. The sleep diary is a subjective record in which subjects document their sleep patterns. The following aspects can be assessed through the sleep diary: Total Sleep Time (TST):Calculated as the time elapsed from the moment of waking to the time of falling asleep. Sleep Efficiency: The ratio of total sleep time (TST) to time in bed (TIB) (multiplied by 100 to yield a percentage) |
| Anxiety (T1) | the first week | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants. This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of anxiety. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible anxiety. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of anxiety in the patient. |
| Anxiety (T2) | the second week | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants. This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of anxiety. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible anxiety. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of anxiety in the patient. |
| Anxiety (T3) | the third week | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants. This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of anxiety. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible anxiety. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of anxiety in the patient. |
| Anxiety (T4) | the fourth week | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants. This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of anxiety. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible anxiety. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of anxiety in the patient. |
| Depression (T1) | the first week | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants. This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of depression. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible depression. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of depression in the patient. |
| Depression (T2) | the second week | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants. This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of depression. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible depression. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of depression in the patient. |
| Depression (T3) | the third week | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants. This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of depression. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible depression. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of depression in the patient. |
| Depression (T4) | the fourth week | The researchers collected data using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) from the participants. This scale, originally developed by Zigmond and Snaith in 1983, was designed for individuals with physical illnesses. It consists of a total of 14 items, each scored on a four-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3 points). The scale comprises 7 items related to anxiety and 7 items related to depression. Interpretation of the scores is as follows: A total score of less than 8 indicates the absence of depression. A score falling between 8 and 10 suggests possible depression. A score exceeding 11 indicates the presence of depression in the patient. |
| Stress index (ms2) (T1) | the first week | The investigators use EUREKA to detect the heartbeat variation of participants and analyze the pressure index. Stress index (ms2) \< 50: abnormal records; 50-150: Normal; 150-500: fatigue state or greater physical and mental stress; 500-900: severe physical and mental stress; \> 900 extreme physical and mental stress or other physical diseases. |
| Stress index (ms2) (T3) | the third week | The investigators use EUREKA to detect the heartbeat variation of participants and analyze the pressure index. Stress index (ms2) \< 50: abnormal records; 50-150: Normal; 150-500: fatigue state or greater physical and mental stress; 500-900: severe physical and mental stress; \> 900 extreme physical and mental stress or other physical diseases. |
Countries
Taiwan
Outcome results
None listed