Skip to content

Addressing Genomic Disparities in Cancer Survivors

Addressing Genomic Disparities in Cancer Survivors

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06073626
Enrollment
428
Registered
2023-10-10
Start date
2024-07-31
Completion date
2027-08-31
Last updated
2025-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Genetic Testing, Hereditary Cancer

Keywords

hereditary cancer, genetic testing, genetic education, relational agent, chatbot

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to increase genetic education and genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk among Black cancer survivors. The study will: 1. Test the effectiveness of a chatbot intervention (also called relational agent, or RA) vs. enhanced usual care (EUC) on engagement in genetic education and requests for genetic testing. 2. Evaluate the impact of the chatbot vs. EUC on the process that participants use to make decisions and evaluate effects on well-being (also called psychosocial outcomes). 3. Explore the ways (methods) that influence how participants experience the intervention. 4. Explore the feasibility of incorporating a Family Sharing Portal (FSP) for participants who receive a positive test result, to facilitate family communication of these test results and genetic testing of first-degree biological relatives after they have received genetic education by the RA. The main questions this study aims to answer are which group - the chatbot (RA) group or the EUC group - is more likely to request genetic testing and which group is more likely to get (engage with) genetic education. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the chatbot (RA) group or EUC group. This means each participant has an equal chance of being placed in either group, just like flipping a coin. Each group will receive genetic education and have an opportunity to request genetic testing. Researchers will compare the chatbot (RA) group and the EUC group to see which may request more GT (genetic testing) and which group engages more with genetic education.

Detailed description

Research Design and Methods: This study will employ a 2-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of the RA intervention compared to EUC among 428 Black cancer survivors who meet the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's guidelines for genetic referral. Primary outcomes will be engagement with genetic education and uptake of genetic testing (Aim 1). The investigators will also evaluate the impact of the RA intervention on psychosocial and decision quality outcomes (Aim 2) and evaluate mediators and moderators of intervention impact (Aim 3). In response to patient identified needs, we will also explore the feasibility of incorporating a Family Sharing Portal (FSP). All participants who receive a positive test result will be input into the FSP (Aim 4). Research Procedures: The design for this study is a 2-arm parallel group trial. Randomization is at the patient level. The investigators will recruit eligible cancer survivors who will be randomized by computer to enhanced usual care (EUC) or RA. Randomization will be balanced in a 1:1 ratio - with 214 participants randomized to each arm. Because this study is designed to address the disparity of low genetic testing utilization in Black cancer patients, all study participants will be Black and approximately 10% will be Hispanic. The investigators will utilize the EHRs at our participating sites to identify cancer survivors who have not been tested despite meeting GT eligibility criteria. Participants will be ascertained from 1) Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center (LCCC), MedStar Washington Cancer Institute (MWCI) and MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center in DC and 2) Rutgers' Cancer Institute (in New Brunswick and at University Hospital Newark) including RWJ Barnabas Health community oncology sites. Participants will be women and men who self-identify as Black or African American, have a history of breast, ovarian, uterine, colorectal, prostate, or pancreatic cancer, are at least six-months post-diagnosis, and have received care at one of the participating sites in the prior five years. There is no limit on the years since diagnosis as genetic testing (GT) can guide treatment decisions and provide opportunities for cascade testing to guide screening and prevention in at-risk relatives.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRelational agent (RA) / Chatbot

Consists of clinical letter and engagement with genetic education and uptake of genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk among Black cancer survivors.

BEHAVIORALEnhanced Usual Care (EUC)

Consists of clinical letter and recommendation for genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk among Black cancer survivors.

Sponsors

Georgetown University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
DOUBLE (Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Treating clinicians will be blind their patients group assignment. While participants cannot be blinded to group, they will be blinded to the study's specific hypotheses. Statisticians and outcome assessors will be blinded to allocation.

Intervention model description

This study will employ a 2-arm parallel group randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of the relational agent/chatbot (RA) intervention compared to Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) among 428 Black cancer survivors. Randomization is at the patient level and will be balanced in a 1:1 ratio - with 214 participants randomized to each arm. Randomization will be in blocks and stratified by recruitment site (DC, NJ). The investigators also plan to enroll a total of 16 usability testing participants across all sites.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 18-80 years of age * Self-identify as Black or African American * At least 6-months post diagnosis with any of the following cancers: breast, ovarian, uterine, prostate, colorectal, pancreatic * Have not had genetic testing for hereditary cancer * Have received care at one of the participating sites in the prior five years * Meet National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria for germline GT * Able to read and speak in English * Capable of providing informed consent * Have internet access (via smartphone, tablet or computer) * Comfortable using a computer or mobile phone independently to access information

Exclusion criteria

* Do not speak English * Unable to access the Internet * Have previously undergone germline genetic testing for hereditary cancer risk or previously had genetic counseling (GC) and declined genetic testing (GT) * Are unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Uptake of Germline Genetic Testing6-monthsAs captured via internal RedCap form for the number or count of participants who opt for genetic testing, the investigators will test the efficacy of a culturally tailored and interactive electronic relational agent (RA) intervention vs. enhanced usual care (EUC) consisting of clinical letter and genetic recommendation on engagement in genetic testing uptake;
Survey Assessment of Impact of RA vs. EUC1-month and 6-month surveyEvaluate the impact of the RA vs. EUC on informed decision-making and psychosocial outcomes via survey measures of related constructs at 1-month and 6-month surveys. Multiple scales are used to measure this outcome and each scale has a unique scoring system.
Survey Assessment of Mediators and Moderators of EfficacyBaseline, 1-month and 6-month surveysExplore potential mechanisms by assessing mediators and moderators of efficacy via survey measures of related constructs at baseline, 1-month and 6-month surveys. Multiple scales are used to measure this outcome and each scale has a unique scoring system.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survey Assessment of Engagement with Genetic Education1-month surveyEngagement with genetic education/counseling via survey measures of related constructs at 1-month survey. Multiple scales are used to measure this outcome and each scale has a unique scoring system.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactErin Speiser, PhD, MA
erin.speiser@rutgers.edu732-675-1668
Backup ContactJulie Chapman Greene, PhD, MPH
chapmaje@cinj.rutgers.edu

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026