Skip to content

The Effectiveness of Electroacupuncture and Standard Therapy Compared to Standard Therapy in Gynecological Cancer Pain

The Effectiveness of Electroacupuncture and Standard Therapy Compared to Standard Therapy in Gynecological Cancer Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06073496
Enrollment
58
Registered
2023-10-10
Start date
2023-08-30
Completion date
2023-12-19
Last updated
2024-01-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer Pain, Cancer Related Pain, Gynecologic Cancer

Keywords

Electroacupuncture, Cancer pain, Gynecological cancer pain, Acupuncture, VAS, EORTC QLQ C 30, Quality of Life, Analgetic Dose

Brief summary

Gynecological cancer is cancer that starts in the female reproductive organs. Pain in gynecological cancer can be caused by an underlying malignancy or surgical procedure as well as chronic pain associated with malignancy and sequelae of the therapy given. Gynecological cancer patients often experience moderate to severe pain and use higher levels of opioids than patients diagnosed with other cancers. More than two thirds of patients with advanced cancer experience severe pain and up to half of these patients report that their pain is not well controlled. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of electroacupuncture plus standard therapy on pain intensity (VAS score), changes in analgesic dose, and quality of life (QLQ C-30 EORTC score) in patients with gynecological cancer pain compared to standard therapy alone.

Detailed description

This study was conducted using single blinded randomized control clinical trial, design in 58 patients diagnosed with gynecological cancer, aged 18 to 65 years, who experienced cancer pain, with VAS ≥ 4, pain caused by a tumor, before or while undergoing a therapeutic process (radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or post surgery), side effects or due to the toxicity of cancer treatment, willing to take part in this study and sign informed consent who were randomized into 2 groups, namely group I electroacupuncture with standard therapy and group 2 standard therapy, the acupuncture points used were LI4, PC6, ST36, SP6 and LR3, after the acupuncture needle was inserted, the needle was connected to the electrosimulator. The outputs assessed were pain intensity using the VAS, changes in analgesic dose, and quality of life with the EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire, which was assessed on the day before starting therapy, the first day, the second day, the third day, the fifth day and the seventh day.

Interventions

OTHERElectroacupuncture

Patient receive analgetic medicine will get experimental procedure with needle insertion that attach to eletrostimulator

Sponsors

Indonesia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

asessor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female 18 to 65 years old * Gynecocal cancer with pain ≥ 4 acording Visual Analog scale and receive analgetic medicine * The pain cause by 1. direct from cancer 2. Treatment proces surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, paliatif treatment, supportive treatment 3. Adverse reaction form treatment and intoxication

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency case patient with hemodynamic instable * Patient with uncooperative behavior because ith serious psychological disorders, no currently undergoing psychiatric treatment, aggressive behavior, that not allowed for acupuncture. * Patients with blood clotting disorders, with platelets \<50.000 and in neutropenic condition with \<1000 neutrophils. * The patient has an allergy to stainless steel acupuncture needles. Wounds at the acupuncture point puncture sites, skin infections in the ears. On patients with eczema on the ears, external otitis or psoriasis. * There is a tumor in the area that will be stabbed and stimulated in the stomach pregnant women, close to the heart, or in the area of the carotid sinus lymphedema, insertion into the prosthesis. * Patients with heart rhythm disorders. The patient uses a pace maker.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain severity with Visual Analog ScaleBefore treatment, After treatment in day 1, day 2, day 3, day 5 and day 7Rating scale for measuring pain, where the minimum value is 0 = no pain, and the maximum value is 100 = severe pain. A higher scale means worse outcomes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Analgetic Usage in dosage and frequencyBefore treatment, After treatment in day 1, day 2, day 3, day 5 and day 7by assessing drug dose reductions and frequency before and after
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life C30before treatment and 7 day after treatmentA Quesionaire for measuring quality of Life

Countries

Indonesia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026