Healthy Eyes, Retinal Diseases
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this pre-market, monocentric cross-sectional study is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of a new version of the MAIA device (MAIA) through an agreement with the established version of the MAIA microperimeter (MAIA 2013 EDITION). Moreover, the study aims to evaluate MAIA test-retest repeatability in comparison with MAIA 2013 EDITION and to evaluate MAIA safety and adverse events. These purposes will be achieved by collecting data of healthy subjects and patients with retinal pathology. All participants will undergo repeated microperimetric examinations with both devices during one single visit.
Interventions
DEVICEMAIA
MAIA is a visual field testing device combining visual field tests, fixation loss correction by a real-time retinal tracker and confocal TrueColor fundus imaging (P/N AHMACME001)
Sponsors
Centervue SpA
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
Healthy Subjects Inclusion Criteria: * Age: 18-90 years old; * BCVA ≥ 0.8 Decimal; * Equivalent spherical refraction between -12D and +6D; astigmatism within 2D; * IOP ≤ 21 mmHg; * Clinically normal appearance of the optic nerve head (examined with Spectralis OCT); * Clinically normal appearance of the macula (examined with Spectralis OCT); * No ocular pathologies, trauma, surgeries; * Absence of pathologies that can affect visual field; * No use of drugs inferfering with the correct execution of perimetry;
Exclusion criteria
* Glaucoma or glaucoma suspect diagnosis; * IOP ≥ 22 mmHg; * Presence or history of disc hemorrhage; * Presence of amblyopia; * Nystagmus or poor fixation; * Previous laser or any ocular surgery, including uncomplicated cataract surgery performed within 6 months before enrollment; * Any active infection of anterior or posterior segments; * Subjects with significant ocular media opacities; * Evidence of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema, or other retinal disease; * Use of any drug that can interfere with the correct execution of microperimetry or that would produce visual field loss; * Unable to tolerate ophthalmic imaging; * Claustrophobia; * Inability to provide informed consent. Patients with retinal pathology Inclusion Criteria: * Age: 18-90 years old; * BCVA ≥ 0.1 Decimal; * Equivalent spherical refraction between -12D and +6D; astigmatism within 2D; * Diagnosis of any type of retinal disease by investigator based on fundoscopy and Spectralis OCT for which microperimetry is indicated;
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the limits of agreement between MAIA and MAIA 2013 EDITION for threshold sensitivity values. | 1 day | Agreement will be quantified by using the method proposed by Bland and Altman \[1,2,3\], estimating the 95%-Limits of Agreement (LoA) of the difference of threshold sensitivity values. The acceptance criteria for agreement between MAIA and MAIA 2013 EDITION is that MAIA's 95% LoA limits are within MAIA 2013 EDITION repeatability limits. 1. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307-10. 2. Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8:135-160 3. Bland JM, Altman DG (2007), Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual, Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 17:571-82 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| To assess the repeatability limits of retinal threshold sensitivity values obtained with MAIA | 1 day | The acceptance criteria is that the 95% LoA limits for MAIA are at least as narrow as MAIA 2013 EDITION repeatability limits. |
| To assess the avoidance of Serious Adverse Device Effects with MAIA | through study completion (expected duration: 3 months) | During the clinical investigation, adverse events will be documented, investigated and reported according to the provisions of applicable reporting guidelines, following their criteria and timelines |
Countries
Switzerland
Outcome results
None listed