Skip to content

Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Bilateral Inguinal Hernia?

Prospective Randomized Study of Comparison Mesh Displacement in Bilateral Laparoscopic İnguinal Hernia Repair With No Fixation: eTEP Versus TEP

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06070207
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-10-06
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2024-04-01
Last updated
2024-05-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Migration of Implant, Pain, Postoperative Complications, Relapse

Brief summary

Inguinal hernia surgery is one of the most frequently performed procedures among general surgery cases. As with many open surgical methods, this repair is also performed laparoscopically. Among these closed methods, the one method is laparoscopic extended total extraperitoneal repair (eTEP). The benefits of laparoscope include less postoperative pain and complications, faster recovery, reduced chronic pain, and recurrence rate. One of the recent debates regarding the laparoscopic technique is mesh fixation. Fixation of the mesh to the cooper ligament can prevent mesh migration and consequently reduce the recurrence rate. However, it has been reported that this fixation may increase postoperative pain. Several studies have reported that recurrence may be due to inadequate mesh fixation technique. In contrast, other prospective randomized studies have found relapse unrelated to mesh fixation. There are studies in the literature on mesh fixation related to the total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) technique. These studies are generally planned for unilateral hernias. It is a controversial issue among surgeons that the possibility of mesh migration is higher in bilateral hernias since there is a larger dissection area. This discussion is the starting point of this study. There were no studies in the literature regarding mesh fixation in bilateral inguinal hernias. The aim of this study is to compare bilateral inguinal hernia patients with and without mesh fixation in the eTEP technique in terms of both mesh migration and clinical features.

Interventions

PROCEDURETEP group

Inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the TEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides.

PROCEDUREeTEP group

Inguinal hernia surgery will be performed with the eTEP method and the 15x12x10 cm polyprolene patch used in this surgery will be marked with small metallic clips from the lateral, superomedial and inferomedial sides.

Sponsors

Van Training and Research Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Mehmet Eşref Ulutaş
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with bilateral inguinal hernias. * Patients aged 18-65.

Exclusion criteria

* Younger than 18 years, and older than 65 years * Incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias, * Recurrent hernias. * Patients with unilateral inguinal hernias. * Patients who are contraindicated to receive general anesthesia. * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Status of Mesh Displacementpostoperative 24 hours, 1 and 6 monthsPatients who are suitable for discharge will be discharged after a pelvis x-ray is taken. One month after the surgery and 6 months later, patients will be called to the outpatient clinic and examined and pelvic radiographs will be taken. The movement of the clips marked on the patch will be compared with previous radiographs in cm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Postoperative painpostoperative 24 hoursIt will be measured using the Visual Analog Score (VAS). The patient will be asked to choose between the number 1 with the least pain and the number 10 with the most pain. The lowest score on this scale is 1, and the highest score is 10.
Rate of Hernia recurrencepostoperative 6th monthhernia recurrence after six months of follow-up. It will be checked by physical examination. Imaging methods will be used in suspicious cases.
Rate of Postoperative complicationspostoperative 24 hours and 1st monthsuch as wound infection, bleeding
Rate of Chronic painpostoperative 1st and 6th monthIt will be measured using the Visual Analog Score (VAS). The patient will be asked to choose between the number 1 with the least pain and the number 10 with the most pain. The lowest score on this scale is 1, and the highest score is 10.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026