Skip to content

Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) vs IFA Acceptability Crossover Trial

Individually Randomized Crossover Trial of Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) Versus IFA During Pregnancy in Tanzania

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06069856
Acronym
MIFA-ACT
Enrollment
130
Registered
2023-10-06
Start date
2027-06-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pregnancy Related

Keywords

Acceptability, Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation, Iron, IFA, Tanzania

Brief summary

This is an open-label individually randomized mixed methods cross-over trial to assess acceptability, preference, and side effects of IFA formulations with 60 mg of iron to MMS formulations with 60 mg of iron.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTIron Folic Acid Tablets with 60 mg of iron

IFA with 60 mg iron is an intervention group. IFA with 60 mg of iron will be taken orally once daily from the time of randomization

MMS with 60 mg iron is an intervention group. MMS with 60 mg of iron plus standard UNIMMAP formulation for other 14 micronutrients will be taken orally once daily from the time of randomization.

Sponsors

George Washington University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Ifakara Health Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
CollaboratorOTHER
Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Africa Academy for Public Health
CollaboratorOTHER
Columbia University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Masking description

None (Open label)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Attending first ANC visit at the study clinic * Pregnant women ≤ 15 weeks of gestation * Aged ≥ 18 years * Intending to stay in the study area for the duration of study * Provides informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Severe anemia (defined as Hb \<8.5 g/dL per Tanzania standard of care) * Sickle cell disease (SS,SC, CC genotype) as tested by HemoTypeSC * Concurrent participation in other nutritional supplementation trial * Pregnant women with disability or condition which would impair their ability to provide informed consent and complete study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability of formulationAt two months of taking each regimenTo assess acceptability of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron and IFA formulation with 60 mg of iron using Likert scales ranging from 1 (disliked a lot) to 5 (liked a lot).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Most preferred formulationAt four months (after taking both regimens)To assess participated reported preference of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron and IFA formulation with 60 mg of iron by asking participants which supplement they like the best.
Side Effects of formulationAt two months of taking each regimenTo assess the percentage of patients experiencing side effects of MMS formulation with 60 mg of iron and IFA formulation with 60 mg of iron
AdherenceAt two months of taking each regimenPercentage pill count of the number of supplements taken

Contacts

CONTACTEmily R Smith, ScD, MPH
emilysmith@gwu.edu202-994-3589
CONTACTChristopher R Sudfeld, ScD, ScM
csudfeld@hsph.harvard.edu
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBlair Wylie, MD, MPH

Columbia University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHonorati Masanja, PhD

Ifakara Health Institute

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAlfa Muhihi, PhD

Africa Academy of Public Health

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAndrea Pembe, MD, MMed, PhD, FCOG

Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOREmily R Smith, ScD, MPH

The George Washington University

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristopher R Sudfeld, ScD, ScM

Harvard University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 5, 2026