Skip to content

Etomidate Versus Propofol in CABG Surgery

Etomidate Versus Propofol As An Anesthesia Induction Agent For Patients Undergoing CABG Surgery, Assessing Hemodynamic Stability. A Single Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06068764
Acronym
ETOPRO
Enrollment
300
Registered
2023-10-05
Start date
2023-12-05
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2023-12-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

CABG surgery, Etomidate, Propofol, general anesthesia induction agenats, cardiothoracic anesthesia

Brief summary

The objective of this single-blinded randomized controlled interventional clinical trial is to learn about the efficacy and long-term safety of etomidate compared to propofol as an anesthesia induction agent in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether patients receiving etomidate or propofol exhibit similar requirements for vasopressor or ionotropic agents during both the intraoperative and postoperative periods. To achieve this goal, participants who are scheduled for CABG surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either etomidate or propofol as the principal hypnotic agent. The researchers will then compare the effects of these two anesthesia induction agents on various factors, including the need for hemodynamic support, hemodynamic stability, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and overall hospital length of stay. Additionally, they will assess whether there are disparities in mortality rates and readmission rates within a 6-month timeframe after the surgery. By comparing the outcomes between the two groups, the study aims to provide valuable insights into the potential differences in vasopressor or ionotropic agent requirements between etomidate and propofol. This information can help inform clinical decision-making and potentially optimize anesthesia management strategies for patients undergoing CABG surgery.

Interventions

DRUGEtomidate

The type of general anesthesia induction agent for CABG surgery

DRUGPropofol

The type of general anesthesia induction agent for CABG surgery

Sponsors

Hartford Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Due to the difference in the physical appearance of etomidate and propofol medications, the anesthesiologist administering any of these medications will not be blinded. Only study patients will be blinded to the anesthesia induction agent they receive. Therefore, this study is considered single-blinded. Since this is a clinical trial, blinding is an important method to reduce bias and ensure the validity of study results. Unblinding is unnecessary in this study unless the situation when a participant experiences a serious adverse event that is unexpected and related to the anesthesia induction agent (study intervention) and the course of treatment needs to be adjusted. Unblinding in this situation will be the decision of the principal investigator (PI). The PI will unblind the patient (i.e., tell the patient about the assigned group), and take any additional necessary course of treatment.

Intervention model description

Single-center, prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients scheduled for elective open coronary arteries bypass graft CABG surgery 2. Patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status score I- IV 3. Patients with the ability to speak and read both English and Spanish

Exclusion criteria

1. Emergency CABG surgery, STAT cases, and add-on cases. 2. Refusal or lack of providing the study consent 3. Patients with a known current adrenocortical insufficiency 4. A patient who is presenting with any kind of shock, (e.g. septic, hypovolemic, cardiogenic, etc.) 5. Patients with chronic steroid use (defined as the use of glucocorticoids within 6 months preoperatively) 6. Patients with a known allergy to etomidate or propofol. 7. Patients with a known seizure disorder. 8. Patients who are enrolled in other clinical research studies that can compete with this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vasopressors dose expressed by Noradrenaline Equivalent dose [μg/kg/min]30 minutes after induction, last 30 minutes of post bypass period, and first 24 hours post procedure.Vasopressor requirements will be expressed as Noradrenaline Equivalent dose using the formula of (NEq \[μg/kg/min\] = norepinephrine + epinephrine + phenylephrine/10 + dopamine/100 + vasopressin\*2.5), this will be measured during three periods of time: Intraoperatively during the first 30 minutes post induction (as a reflection of the impact of induction on hemodynamics), intraoperatively during the last 30 minutes of the post bypass period, and for the first 24 hours post procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ICU length of stay3 daysICU length of stay will be calculated in hours using the ICU data from EPIC.
Hospital length of stay7 daysHospital length of stay will be calculated in hours from the date and time of admission and discharge, from EPIC.
The number of incidences of shockFirst 24 hours post anesthesiaThe incidence of both vasogenic and cardiogenic shocks will be determined intraoperatively and postoperatively using the Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), Central Venous Pressure (CVP), Cardiac Output (CO), and Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR). Vasogenic shock (defined as a MAP \< 60 mmHg with normal CO (\>2.0 L/min) and low SVR (\< 900 dynes/sec). Cardiogenic shock (defined as hypotension with MAP \< 60 mmHg, low CO (\<2.0 L/min), and normal SVR range (900-1400 dynes/sec).
Time to extubation and end of mechanical ventilationuntil extubation, assessed as 6 hoursTime to extubation, the standard of care is usually within 6 hours of arriving to the unit.
Incidence of Death6 monthsIn the 6th month after surgery, a retrospective safety checkup will be done, using EPIC chart review, to assess the number of deaths if any.
Hospital Readmissions6 monthsIn the 6th month after surgery, a retrospective safety checkup will be done, using EPIC chart review, to assess the number of readmissions.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAseel Walker, MD
Aseel.Walker@hhchealth.org860-972-1778

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026