Skip to content

Robotic Right Hemicolectomy Versus Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy

Robotic Right Hemicolectomy With Intracorporeal Anastomosis Versus Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Extracorporeal Anastomosis (PRORHEM): a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06067620
Acronym
PRORHEM
Enrollment
70
Registered
2023-10-05
Start date
2024-08-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2024-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Adenocarcinoma, Colorectal Adenoma, Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Benign, Colorectal Neoplasms Malignant, Colorectal Polyp

Brief summary

Robotic right hemicolectomy with intra-corporeal anastomosis may have better short-term recovery outcomes and decreased incidence of incisional hernia when compared to the laparoscopic actual standard of care, for similar safety outcomes.

Detailed description

During laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (lapRHC) for cancer or polyp, intra-corporeal anastomosis (ICA) offers better short-term recovery and decreased incidence of incisional hernia (IH) when compared to extra-corporeal anastomosis (ECA). However, because of the technical limitations of laparoscopy, ICA has not gained in wide acceptance and ECA has remained the standard of care. On the contrary, robotics offers improved suturing capacities and facilitates the realization of ICA. Therefore, robotic right hemicolectomy (robRHC) with ICA may have better short-term recovery outcomes and decreased incidence of IH when compared to the laparoscopic actual standard of care. In a randomized controlled trial, we will compare robRHC with ICA with lapRHC with ECA, in terms of recovery of bowel function (time to first passage of faeces). Secondary outcomes will notably include length of stay, incidence of IH, patient-reported esthetical outcomes and safety outcomes (morbidity, mortality, proximal and distal margins, harvested lymph nodes).

Interventions

Robotic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis and extraction through a C-section, using the Da Vinci Xi.

Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with extracorporeal anastomosis and extraction through midline.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Geneva
CollaboratorOTHER
Spital Biel, Switzerland
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hôpital Fribourgeois
CollaboratorOTHER
Jeremy Meyer
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients requiring elective minimally invasive RHC for cT1-T3 Nx M0 cancer of the right colon (including cancer of the appendix, caecum, ascending colon and hepatic flexure).

Exclusion criteria

* Not scheduled for minimally invasive RHC (refuses surgery and/or planned open approach) * Emergency surgery * Hereditary colorectal cancer * Inflammatory bowel disease * Synchronous resection of (an)other organ(s) * Synchronous surgical procedure (including more extended resection of the lower gastrointestinal tract) * cT4 * cM+ * History of laparotomy * Pregnancy * No anastomosis planned * Unable to provide informed consent * No informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to first passage of faecesFrom index surgical procedure (skin closure) until time of first passage of faeces, during hospitalisation, on average during the first 7 post-operative daysMeasured in hours, starting at the skin closure of the index surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood lossFrom skin incision to skin closure, during index surgical procedureMeasured in ml
Intra-operative transfusionFrom skin incision to skin closure, during index surgical procedureNumber of patients who received blood and/or blood products transfusion
Intra-operative complicationFrom skin incision to skin closure, during index surgical procedureNumber of patients who experienced a complication during the index surgery
Conversion to open surgeryFrom skin incision to skin closure, during index surgical procedureNumber of patients who had conversion to open surgery; defined as an extraction site longer than 10cm
Length of the extraction siteAt post-operative day 30Measured in centimeters
Creation of a stomaFrom skin incision to skin closure, during index surgical procedureNumber of patients who received a stoma during the index surgery
Hb, WBC and CRPAt post-operative day 1, post-operative day 2, post-operative day 3, post-operative day 4 and post-operative day 5Blood tests
Time to first passage of flatusFrom index surgical procedure (skin closure) until time of first passage of flatus, during hospitalisation, on average during the first 7 post-operative daysMeasured in hours, starting at the skin closure of the index surgery
In-hospital postoperative ileusDuring hospitalisation, on average during the first 5 post-operative daysNumber of patients who experienced a post-operative ileus which required the insertion of a nasogastric tube
Length of stayFrom the first day of hospitalisation to the day of discharge, on average during the first 10 post-operative daysMeasured in days
Post-operative morbidityFrom index surgical procedure (skin closure) to post-operative day 30Number of patients who experienced post-operative morbidity, as measured by the Clavien-Dindo scale
Surgical site infectionFrom index surgical procedure (skin closure) to post-operative day 7 and post-operative day 30Number of patients who experienced surgical site infection
Duration of surgeryFrom skin incision to skin closure, during index surgical procedureMeasured in minutes
Re-interventionFrom index surgical procedure (skin closure) to post-operative day 30Number of patients who required a surgical re-intervention associated with the index surgery
MortalityFrom index surgical procedure (skin closure) to post-operative day 30Number of patients who experienced mortality
Proximal marginWithin 10 days from the index surgical procedureMeasured in centimeters, on the operative specimen of the index surgery
Distal marginWithin 10 days from the index surgical procedureMeasured in centimeters, on the operative specimen of the index surgery
Harvested lymph nodesWithin 10 days from the index surgical procedureNumber of harvested lymph nodes, on the operative specimen of the index surgery
Histology of the tumor/polypWithin 10 days from the index surgical procedureType of cancer and/or polyp, based on the operative specimen of the index surgery
TNM stageWithin 10 days from the index surgical procedure8th edition of the UICC TNM classification, based on the operative specimen of the index
Bowel functionAt post-operative day 30 and post-operative year 1Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GQLI)
Quality of recoveryAt post-operative hour 12, post-operative day 1, post-operative day 2, post-operative day 3, post-operative day 4, post-operative day 5 and post-operative day 7Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score
Aesthetic numeric analogue scale (ANA-scale)At post-operative day 30 and post-operative year 1Measuring the patient-reported esthetical aspect of the surgical wounds
Incidence of incisional herniaAt post-operative year 1Overall, and at extraction site; measured clinically and by CT
Anastomotic leakFrom index surgical procedure (skin closure) to post-operative day 30Number of patients who experienced anastomotic leak, with radiological and/or surgical confirmation

Contacts

Primary ContactJeremy Meyer, MD, MD-PhD
jeremy.meyer@hcuge.ch+41795533248

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 10, 2026