Ankle Fractures, Distal Radius Fractures, Proximal Humeral Fracture
Conditions
Keywords
Distal Radius Fracture, Proximal Humeral Fracture, Ankle Fracture, Mixed Reality, Patient Education, Informed Consent, Patient Satisfaction
Brief summary
This clinical trial aims to compare a Mixed Reality Viewer in the preoperative informed consent process to standard fracture visualization. The participants population are patients with an indication for surgery of a distal radius fracture, upper ankle fracture or proximal humerus fracture using plate osteosynthesis. The main questions aim to answer are: * Does the use of the Mixed Reality Viewer improve patient understanding? * Does the use of the Mixed Reality Viewer improve patient satisfaction? * Does the use of the Mixed Reality Viewer reduce patient preoperative anxiety? Participants will have their fracture presented via the Mixed Reality Viewer. Researchers will compare standard fracture imaging using X-ray or CT scans to see if there is any difference in understanding, satisfaction and anxiety.
Detailed description
In everyday clinical practice, patients receive a verbal explanation of their medical condition, optional treatment options, and information about the benefits, risks and complications of surgery during preoperative education. To visualize the respective fractures to the patients, they are shown using X-rays, CT scans or MRI images. However, these images are often difficult to understand without prior medical knowledge. A better understanding of the fracture by the patients and a more comprehensible visualization of the operations can lead to better informed consent between the patients and the doctor. Consequential benefits for treatment and postoperative follow-up may follow. The investigators hypothesis is that fracture visualization using a Mixed Reality Viewer can generate higher fracture understanding in patients. As a result of better education, this visualization method could lead to higher patient satisfaction and anxiety reduction. Patients with an indication for surgery of a distal radius fracture, upper ankle fracture or proximal humerus fracture using plate osteosynthesis are randomized into the intervention group or the control group. Both study groups watch verbal education via a recorded video. The intervention group afterward receives a fracture visualization via mixed reality glasses. The control group receives fracture visualization via X-ray or CT scan. In both the intervention group and the control group, the type of fracture, the extent of the fracture, the surgical method, and the benefits and risks of the surgery are explained to the patients during the visualization. After the explanation is completed, patients are asked to complete a questionnaire regarding satisfaction and fracture understanding.
Interventions
DEVICEMixed Reality Viewer
The Mixed Reality Viewer from Brainlab (Germany) enables the visualization of the fracture via a 3D hologram. In contrast to virtual reality, where the user is in a completely virtual world, the user of the mixed reality viewer sees the 3D hologram implemented in his real environment.
DEVICEX-ray or CT scan
X-ray or CT scan enables the visualization of the fracture in 2D.
Sponsors
LMU Klinikum
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Indication for surgery of a distal radius fracture, upper ankle fracture, or proximal humerus fracture using plate osteosynthesis * Age ≥ 18 years old * Existing signed confirmation of participation in the study * Ability to understand a German interview and questionnaire
Exclusion criteria
* Epilepsy * Patients with mental limitations (e.g. dementia) or severe visual impairments that prevent informed consent emergency surgery * Age \< 18 or \> 80 years old * Inability to understand a German interview and questionnaire
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Understanding | Measurement is assessed via a questionnaire immediately after the procedure. | A questionnaire is used to determine the patients' level of understanding via content-related questions about their specific fractures. Patients answer questions on a 6-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better outcome. |
| Patient Satisfaction with the educational process assessed by the 6-point Likert scale | Measurement is assessed via a questionnaire immediately after the procedure. | A questionnaire is used to determine the patient's satisfaction with the educational process. Patients answer questions on a 6-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better outcome. |
| Patient Preoperative Anxiety | Measurement is assessed via a questionnaire immediately after the procedure. | A questionnaire is used to determine the patient's anxiety regarding their upcoming surgical procedure. Patients answer the question on a 10-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating worse outcome.. |
Countries
Germany
Contacts
Primary ContactRouven Neudeck
Outcome results
None listed