Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Conditions
Brief summary
This research aimed to ascertain the combined and individual efficacies of MCE and BT in alleviating SIJD symptoms.
Detailed description
The study will be based on a four-arm parallel group randomized control design. one hundred and twenty participants with SIJD will be recruited from the Physiotherapy department, at Integral University, India. Study objectives and procedure will be properly explained and written informed consent will be obtained at the beginning of the study. All the participants will be randomly divided into four groups A, B, C, and D. Experimental group A will be receiving the hot pack, Stretching exercise, and MCE intervention, group B will receive the hot pack, Stretching exercise, and BT exercise and Group C will be receiving the hot pack, Stretching exercise, and MCE & BT intervention, control group D will receive the hot pack, Stretching exercise intervention.
Interventions
Motor control exercises focusing on the activation and control of deep spinal muscles
OTHERBalance Training
Balance training exercises on to enhance proprioception and stability
OTHERControl Group
Participants received hot pack and stretching exercise
Sponsors
Najran University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age-30-60 Years * sacroiliac joint pain (\>3 months) * Presence of pain exacerbated as a result of bending laterally or backward * Positive results on at least 2 of the pain-provocation tests \[FABER, Posterior shear and Gaenslen pain provocation tests) and one of the motion palpation tests (ie, Gillet and forward flexion tests)
Exclusion criteria
* past or current history of surgery or major trauma to spine, pelvis, lower limb, chest or abdomen in the past 12 months * lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders; known localized spinal pathology * known congenital anomalies of hip, pelvis or spine that limits mobility * known systematic arthropathy, neuropathy or metabolic disorder * Presence of other causes of LBP such as lumbar discopathy and spinal stenosis discovered via clinical examination and MRI scanning * pregnancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Intensity | 6 Weeks | The pain intensity was assessed Using a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), It's a 11 point scale, where zero indicates no pain and 10 indicates severe pain |
| Functional disability | 6 Weeks | Functional limitation was assessed by using Oswestry disability Index questionnaire Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. |
| self-reported measure of health | 6 Weeks | It comprises 36 questions that cover eight domains of health |
Countries
India, Saudi Arabia
Outcome results
None listed