Skip to content

Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression

Effects of Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06061653
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-09-29
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2023-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder

Brief summary

Depression is among the most prevalent psychiatric disorders, with an upward trend in its manifestation in younger individuals. In contrast to adult depression, adolescent depression often presents with longer attack durations, higher recurrence rates, chronicity, and elevated disability rates. At present, treatment options for adolescent depression encompass pharmacological, physical, and psychological therapies. However, current evidence suggests that no antidepressant medication is entirely safe for youths, with only fluoxetine and escitalopram being FDA-approved for treating adolescent depression. Given the weight of interpersonal stressors faced by teenagers, the NICE guidelines recommend interpersonal therapy(IPT) as a first-line treatment. A 2020 meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry reported that interpersonal therapy exhibited significantly greater improvements in depression symptoms than cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT), although psychotherapeutic effects were modest, achieving a remission rate of 60%. These results underscore the need for further research to enhance interpersonal therapy's effectiveness in treating adolescent depression. High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS)is a highly secure non-invasive brain stimulation technique that produces sustained effects even after stimulation has discontinued, rendering it particularly valuable for therapeutic interventions. The proposed study aims to augment a single IPT treatment with HD-tDCS stimulation for adolescent depression. By enhancing the excitability of the cerebral cortex, HD-tDCS could potentially enhance IPT's therapeutic efficacy in treating adolescent depression while facilitating further investigation of its underlying neural circuit mechanisms.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTIPT plus HD-tDCS

psychotherapy plus device

COMBINATION_PRODUCTIPT plus sham HD-tDCS

psychotherapy plus sham device

Sponsors

First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Sign a written informed consent form, willing to participate in the study and accept treatment (patients under 18 years of age need to obtain the consent of their parents or legal guardians); 2. Age between 12 and 18 years; 3. Right-handed; 4. Han ethnicity; 5. Meet the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for depression; 6. HAMD-24≥20; 7. Understand written language and able to complete questionnaires; 8. First-episode depression patients who have never received any treatment or relapse depression patients, have not taken any psychotropic drugs in the past 2 weeks, have not received systematic psychological or physical therapy.

Exclusion criteria

1.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating ScaleBaselineAssessment of depressive symptoms. Score\<8: normal; \>20: mild or moderate depression; \>35: severe depression.
Child Depression Rating Scale-RevisedBaselineAssessment of depressive symptoms. Score\<40: normal; 40\ 60: mild or moderate depression; \>60: severe depression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure ScaleBaselineA total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
Interpersonal Relationship ScaleBaselineA score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Emotion Regulation QuestionnaireBaselineA total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20BaselineIt consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for YouthsBaselineAssesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
Comfort Rating QuestionnaireBaselineEvaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
IL-6 levelBaselineDetection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating ScaleBaselineScore\<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
EEG dataBaselineReflecting brain function. It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)BaselineReflecting cortical excitability. N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1). Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
Perceptual judgment testBaselineAssess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
Distance memory testBaselineAssessment of Working memory.
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)BaselineTHINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers. The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function. The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
ERP experimentBaselineThe participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded. Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.
MRI dataBaselineReflecting brain structure and function
Beck Scale for Suicide IdeationBaselineAssessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are no, it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is \[(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33\] \* 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactManli Huang, M.D
huangmanli@zju.edu.cn13957162975
Backup ContactXiaoyi Zhou
zhouxiaoyi@zju.edu.cn15158866089

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026