Cirrhosis, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Conditions
Keywords
Implementation science, Implementation strategies, Implementation barriers, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change, Precision implementation, Liver cancer, Early detection of cancer
Brief summary
Barriers that prevent healthcare methods supported by science from being adopted in the real world have led to low-quality, inequitable medical care. Implementation science aims to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap but still lacks simple and convenient methods to identify implementation barriers, systematically track which strategies work to improve care, and provide accessible data and expert recommendations to guide implementation strategy selection for use in research and practice. Project OASIS (Optimizing Approaches to Select Implementation Strategies) will conduct a hybrid type-III, cluster-randomized trial of a new decision aid tool that matches site variables and barriers to successful implementation strategies.
Detailed description
Implementation science aims to improve the uptake of evidence-based health care practices (EBPs) by defining barriers that prevent their use, offering strategies to overcome these barriers, and developing methods that help clinicians and researchers choose strategies that best address the barriers they encounter. With strategy selection often being inefficient and idiosyncratic, experts have called for methods to make strategy selection scientific, data-driven, and "precise." This "precision implementation" causes a critical need to identify implementation barriers and facilitators quickly and uniformly, track implementation strategy use and effectiveness, and incorporate data and expert knowledge into the process of matching strategies to barriers. Without these improvements, there is a risk of perpetuating implementation failures and health care disparities. Project OASIS (Optimizing Approaches to Select Implementation Strategies) will conduct a cluster-randomized, hybrid type III trial to compare a machine learning derived decision aid (DA) for selecting implementation strategies with a current expert opinion-based tool in 20 VA medical centers. The investigators will apply the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) evaluative framework and assess rates of hepatocellular carcinoma screening (an EBP) for Veterans with cirrhosis at these sites. As this is a facility-level intervention, Veterans with cirrhosis will be cluster randomized to the DA vs. Current Tool arms. The investigators anticipate that Veterans at sites in the DA arm will be significantly more likely to receive screening than Veterans at sites in the Current Tool arm.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALOASIS DA training
The OASIS decision aid is a novel implementation strategy selection tool developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts using machine learning algorithms and user-centered design approaches.
BEHAVIORALCurrent DA Tool training
The CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool is a currently available decision aid tool for selecting implementation strategies that is based on expert opinion.
Sponsors
VA Office of Research and Development
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
This hybrid type III trial will compare the effectiveness and implementation of the decision aid (DA) vs. Current Tool to improve liver cancer screening for Veterans with cirrhosis in 20 VA sites, as well as assess how users make decisions based on the source of the recommendation (e.g., expert opinion vs. machine-derived). VA clinicians in both arms will receive a one-time 1-hour webinar training on either the new DA or the Current Tool. Trainers will be available to provide technical assistance after the webinars during the 6-month implementation phase but will not provide additional implementation support. Participants will be encouraged to initiate the recommended strategies within 3 months of training.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Veterans: * Veterans with two outpatient or one inpatient codes for cirrhosis or its complications who had an encounter in the prior 18 months at a participating VA medical center VA clinicians: * Physicians, advance practice providers, nurses, leadership, and staff engaged with selecting and applying implementation strategies to improve care at a participating VA medical center
Exclusion criteria
* Veterans post-transplant or with active hepatocellular carcinoma
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Reach as assessed by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening rates | measured quarterly 1 year pre-intervention through 6 months post-intervention | Reach of an intervention refers to the absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are willing to participate in a given intervention. The reach outcome will be the percentage of active VA patients with a diagnosis of cirrhosis receiving guideline-concordant abdominal imaging every 6 months. |
| Effectiveness as assessed by patient outcomes | measured quarterly 1 year pre-intervention through 6 months post-intervention | Effectiveness is the impact of an intervention on important individual outcomes. Patient outcomes such as cancers detected and linkage to curative treatment will be used to assess effectiveness. |
| Adoption as assessed by % improvement in HCC screening performance | measured quarterly 1 year pre-intervention through 6 months post-intervention | Adoption is the absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of settings/people who are willing to initiate a program. The investigators will assess adoption by the percent improvement in screening performance at intervention sites from pre- to post-intervention. |
| Implementation as assessed by fidelity to HCC screening recommendations | measured quarterly 1 year pre-intervention through 6 months post-intervention | Implementation is the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended. The investigators will assess implementation by the proportion of patients at an intervention site receiving all hepatocellular carcinoma screening as recommended (correct timing and modality). |
| Maintenance as assessed by maintenance of other measures | 6 months post-intervention | Maintenance is the extent to which a program becomes part of routine organizational practices. The investigators will assess maintenance by sustainment of all above outcomes at 6 months post-intervention. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) | up to 4 weeks, 6 months post-intervention | Acceptability refers to a given innovation being perceived as agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory by implementation stakeholders. The AIM is a 4-item measure scored on a 5-point Likert scale. |
| Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) | up to 4 weeks, 6 months post-intervention | Appropriateness is the perceived fit of an innovation to address a particular issue or problem. The IAM is a 4-item measure on a 5-point Likert scale. |
| Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) | up to 4 weeks, 6 months post-intervention | Feasibility refers to the extent to which an innovation can be successfully used within a given setting. The FIM is a 4-item measure on a 5-point Likert scale. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORShari S Rogal, MD MPH
VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System University Drive Division, Pittsburgh, PA
Outcome results
None listed