Skip to content

LAmbre Versus AMPLATZER Amulet Left AtrIal Appendage Occluder for StRoke ProphylaxIs

LAmbre Versus AMPLATZER Amulet Left AtrIal Appendage Occluder for StRoke ProphylaxIs: The Randomized AMPIRI Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06060912
Acronym
AMPIRI
Enrollment
226
Registered
2023-09-29
Start date
2023-12-05
Completion date
2027-10-15
Last updated
2024-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Keywords

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion, Non-pharmacological anticoagulation therapy, Stroke prophylaxis

Brief summary

The objective of this trial is to compare two different commercially available left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices in patients with non-valvular Atrial fibrillation/ atrial flutter (AF) at increased risk for stroke with regard to safety and efficacy. The investigators hypothesize that LAAO using the LAmbre occlusion device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) is non-inferior to LAAO using the AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device (Abbott Medical, Chicago, ILL, USA) with regards to the primary endpoint, which is peri-device leak (PDL) size 3 months after LAAO, as assessed with transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) in patients with non-valvular AF.

Detailed description

AMPIRI is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, multi-center, open-label, non-inferiority other clinical investigation. All consecutive patients with non-valvular AF at increased risk for stroke or systemic embolism based on CHA2DS2-VASc score not eligible for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy will qualify for screening. Patients with confirmed eligibility and who have given written informed consent will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to group A (LAmbre LAAO device) or group B (AMPLATZER Amulet LAAO device). Clinical indication, technique, and timing of LAAO will be at the operator's discretion. The investigators hypothesize that LAAO using the LAmbre occlusion device (Lifetech Scientific, Shenzhen, China) is non-inferior to LAAO using the AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device (Abbott Medical, Chicago, ILL, USA) with regards to the primary endpoint, which is PDL size 3 months after LAAO, as assessed with TOE in patients with non-valvular AF.

Interventions

DEVICELeft Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion will be performed according to current international standards by experienced operators under TOE and angiographic guidance. Either a LAmbre occlusion device (group A) or an AMPLATZER Amulet occlusion device (group B) will be implanted depending on treatment allocation.

Sponsors

Lifetech Scientific (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

AMPIRI is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority other clinical investigation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years and able to give consent * Documented paroxysmal, persistent or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation/ atrial flutter (AF) at high risk of stroke or systemic embolism defined by CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 (male) or ≥ 3 (female) * Patient not eligible for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy * Deemed suitable for percutaneous LAAO * Able to comply with the required medication regimen after LAAO device implantation * Written informed consent * LAA anatomy can accommodate either a LAmbre or AMPLATZER Amulet LAAO device, as per manufacturer's instruction for use (IFU) (the anatomy and sizing must be appropriate for both devices in order to be enrolled in the trial) * For women of childbearing potential, negative pregnancy test and agree to use reliable method of birth control during the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Indication for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy for a condition other than AF (i. e. pulmonary embolism, mechanical heart valve) 2. LAA is obliterated or surgically ligated 3. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the LAAO devices or components of the required medication regimen 4. Prior atrial septal defect (ASD) repair or implantation of ASD closure device 5. Active endocarditis or other infection producing bacteremia 6. Significant symptomatic carotid artery disease 7. Participation in a concurrent clinical trial, which may confound the results of this trial 8. Patient cannot adhere to or complete the trial protocol for any reason Or any of the following echocardiographic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PDL size after 3 monthsthree monthsPeri-device leak size (in mm) three months after successful LAAO as assessed with TOE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Device Sucessat index prozedureDefined as device deployed and implanted in correct position.
Procedural Durationat index procedureEnd time (closing of X-Ray) minus start time (access site puncture).
Technical successduring index hospitalizationDefined as exclusion of the LAA with residual peri device leak size ≤ 5mm and no device-related complications during index hospitalization.
Procedural successat index proceduredefined as technical success with no procedure-related complications, except for uncomplicated (minor) device embolization
Device-related complicationsat three monthsAll complications which are a result of the presence of the device and require either a surgical or percutaneous intervention or other medical treatment (device embolization, device erosion, clinically significant device interference with surrounding structure, device thrombus, device fracture, device infection/pericarditis, endocarditis, device perforation/laceration or device allergy)
Procedure-related complicationsduring index hospitalizationPericardial effusion with or without tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or surgical intervention.
Composite of ischaemic stroke or systemic embolismduring index hospitalization and up to 24 monthsIncidence of ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism, as described below.
Large residual peri-device leak size > 5mmat three monthsLarge peri device leak size (in mm) \>5 mm three months after successful LAAO as assessed with TOE.
Device thrombusat three monthsDevice thrombus at three months after successful LAAO as assessed with TOE.
All-cause death or cardiovascular deathduring index hospitalization and up to 24 monthsCardiovascular Death: * Death due to proximate cardiac cause, e.g. myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, worsening heart failure, and endocarditis. * Death caused by non-coronary, non-CNS vascular conditions such as pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular disease. * Death from vascular CNS causes from haemorrhagic stroke or from ischaemic stroke. * All procedure-related deaths, including those related to a complication of the procedure or treatment for a complication of the procedure. * Sudden or unwitnessed death defined as non-traumatic, unexpected fatal event occurring within 1 hour of the onset of symptoms in an apparently healthy subject. If death is not witnessed, the definition applies when the victim was in good health 24 hours before the event. * Death of unknown cause: Non-cardiovascular death: Death of a primary cause that is clearly related to another condition (e.g. trauma, cancer, suicide).
All-strokeduring index hospitalization and up to 24 monthsDefined as an acute episode of focal or global neurological deficit with at least one of the following: change in the level of consciousness, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, one-sided numbness or sensory loss, dysphasia or aphasia, hemianopia, amaurosis fugax or any other neurological signs or symptoms consistent with stroke. It is caused by brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury as a result of hemorrhage or infarction. A transient ischemic attack (TIA) should be clearly distinguished from ischemic stroke, based on focal neurological symptoms lasting \<24 hours and imaging-confirmed absence of acute brain infarction. Therefore, it is mandatory to recommend imaging confirmation as part of the diagnosis. Stroke assessment requires a neuroimaging and neurological examination, preferably by a neurologist.
Systemic embolismduring index hospitalization and up to 24 monthsSystemic embolism: Acute vascular insufficiency or occlusion of the extremities or any non-central nervous system organ associated with clinical, imaging, surgical/autopsy evidence of arterial occlusion in the absence of other likely mechanism (e.g., trauma, atherosclerosis, or instrumentation). When there is presence of prior peripheral artery disease, angiographic or surgical or autopsy evidence is required to show abrupt arterial occlusion.
Major bleedingduring index hospitalizationDefined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥ 3.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactMichael Joner, MD
joner@dhm.mhn.de+4989-1218-2869
Backup ContactTobias Rheude, MD
rheude@dhm.mhn.de+4989-1218-2985

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026