Skip to content

Theta Burst Stimulation for Alcohol Use Disorder

Theta Burst Stimulation for Alcohol Use Disorder

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06060496
Enrollment
8
Registered
2023-09-29
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-04-17
Last updated
2025-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Use Disorder

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Brief summary

The study will examine the effects of two continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) sessions (given in a single day) on resting state functional MRI (fMRI), alcohol cue related attentional bias and alcohol craving in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD).

Detailed description

Although pharmacotherapy and behavioral treatments have been approved for AUD, their effects sizes are modest. Noninvasive neuromodulation like Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can offer an alternative treatment option for AUD. TMS is a method of noninvasive neuromodulation that utilizes a magnetic field to focal electrical current in the brain. When these electrical currents are focused on specific brain regions, pertinent to the neurobiology of AUD it leads to modulation of behavior and plausibly decrease in alcohol craving and use. Previous TMS studies have used heterogenous parameters, including frequencies ranging from 1 Hz to 20 Hz. Regions targeted by these studies encompassed ventromedial prefrontal cortex, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (left dlPFC) and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Two studies used a TMS paradigm with greater efficiency than other routine TMS paradigms, called continuous theta burst stimulation. These studies delivered 3600 pulses of cTBS to the left frontal pole/ventromedial prefrontal cortex and showed significant reduction in alcohol cue reactivity and corroborative changes in both resting state and task based functional connectivity. Of these two studies, one was notable in comparing active cTBS (3600 pulses per session, one session every day for ten days over two weeks) versus sham cTBS. A deep TMS (dTMS) study that compared dTMS (15 sessions, five sessions every week for three weeks) to sham dTMS using an H7 coil (targeting medial prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices). This study showed decreased craving after treatment and percentage of heavy drinking days in the active versus sham control group. Active dTMS was associated with decreased resting-state functional connectivity of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex with the caudate nucleus and decreased connectivity of the medial prefrontal cortex to the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex. No study has done multiple sessions of cTBS in a single day. In addition, no study has previously delivered cTBS to the left dlPFC, to modulate alcohol craving and alcohol cue based attentional bias.

Interventions

Two cTBS sessions (each session delivering 3600 pulses) separated by 50 minutes

DEVICESham cTBS

Two sham cTBS sessions (sham mimics the experimental session but does not deliver any electricity to the brain) separated by 50 minutes

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Gopalkumar Rakesh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Using the MagVenture A/P coil

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

. * Patients seen at a clinic within the University of Kentucky Healthcare * 21-60 years of age * male or female gender * Able to read, understand and communicate in English * willing to adhere to the general rules of the UK Healthcare * Must fulfill criteria for moderate alcohol use disorder.

Exclusion criteria

* Positive pregnancy test for females * traumatic brain injury, history of seizure disorder, history of or current diagnosis of schizophrenia * intracranial metal shrapnel * previous adverse effect with TMS * sub-threshold consistency while performing behavioral tasks * failure to show baseline attentional bias to alcohol versus neutral cues.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Penn Alcohol Craving ScaleBefore and after two cTBS sessions, approximately 2 hoursCraving measured using the Penn alcohol craving scale (PACS) that has five items and is rated on a scale of 1 to 6. Minimum score is 1 and maximum score is 30. Higher score equates to increased craving
Change in Alcohol Cue Attentional BiasBefore and after two cTBS sessions, approximately 2 hoursFixation time on alcohol cues measured using an eye tracker in milliseconds. Higher score indicates greater attentional bias.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resting State Functional ConnectivityBefore and after two cTBS sessions, approximately 2 hoursNumber of participants with resting state functional connectivity scans acquired before and after cTBS and sham cTBS

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active cTBS and Sham cTBS
There is only one arm in this study and all participants in this arm will receive 2 interventions: active and sham cTBS in a within subject blinded fashion. They will first receive active cTBS and then sham cTBS, separated by four weeks to minimize carryover effects. Active cTBS: Two cTBS sessions (each session delivering 3600 pulses) separated by 50 minutes Sham cTBS: Two sham cTBS sessions (sham mimics the experimental session but does not deliver any electricity to the brain) separated by 50 minutes
8
Total8

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive cTBS and Sham cTBS
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants
Age, Continuous41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 4
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Alcohol Cue Attentional Bias

Fixation time on alcohol cues measured using an eye tracker in milliseconds. Higher score indicates greater attentional bias.

Time frame: Before and after two cTBS sessions, approximately 2 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
cTBS and Sham cTBSChange in Alcohol Cue Attentional BiasBaseline_cTBS294.92 millisecondsStandard Deviation 667.18
cTBS and Sham cTBSChange in Alcohol Cue Attentional BiasAfter second session_cTBS459.60 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1618.57
cTBS and Sham cTBSChange in Alcohol Cue Attentional BiasBaseline_sham cTBS355.3 millisecondsStandard Deviation 659.06
cTBS and Sham cTBSChange in Alcohol Cue Attentional BiasAfter second session_sham cTBS666.30 millisecondsStandard Deviation 1592.36
Primary

Change in Penn Alcohol Craving Scale

Craving measured using the Penn alcohol craving scale (PACS) that has five items and is rated on a scale of 1 to 6. Minimum score is 1 and maximum score is 30. Higher score equates to increased craving

Time frame: Before and after two cTBS sessions, approximately 2 hours

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
cTBS and Sham cTBSChange in Penn Alcohol Craving ScaleBaseline_cTBS11.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.68
cTBS and Sham cTBSChange in Penn Alcohol Craving ScaleAfter second session_cTBS11.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.43
cTBS and Sham cTBSChange in Penn Alcohol Craving ScaleBaseline_sham cTBS8.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.44
cTBS and Sham cTBSChange in Penn Alcohol Craving ScaleAfter second session_sham cTBS7.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.7
Secondary

Resting State Functional Connectivity

Number of participants with resting state functional connectivity scans acquired before and after cTBS and sham cTBS

Time frame: Before and after two cTBS sessions, approximately 2 hours

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
cTBS and Sham cTBSResting State Functional Connectivity4 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026