Prostatic Neoplasm
Conditions
Brief summary
Accurate preservation of neuro-vascular bundles is crucial in guaranteeing erectile function recovery after robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, the nerve sparing approach is associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins (PSM) at final pathology. Augmented reality (AR) RARP was previously associated with a 10-15% reduction in the rates of PSMs in two retrospective series. However, prospective studies are needed to demonstrate clinical utility and to validate these technologies. The hypotheses of this study are that: 1) AR RARP reduces the rates of PSMs, if compared to standard approach; 2) AR RARP can guarantee a more accurate preservation of neurovascular bundles and, in consequence, a greater recovery of erectile function; 3) the lower rates of PSMs will translate in greater oncological control of the disease.
Detailed description
This is a Phase III, monocentric, prospective trial in which patients will be randomized to AR RARP vs. standard approach (standard RARP). Patient population is defined as: patients≥18 years old, untreated biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate classified as European Association of Urology (EAU) low or intermediate risk (PSA≤20 ng/ml and cT≤2b and International Society for Urological Pathology \[ISUP\] grade group≤III), pre-operative International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5)≥20, no contraindications for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). The primary objective of this study is to compare the rates of PSMs with AR RARP vs. standard RARP. Secondary objectives are the rates of nerve sparing approaches and erectile function recovery at 3-, 6- and 12-months after surgery in AR RARP vs. standard RARP. Subgroup analyses will tested for a specific subgroup of patients in which AR RARP should be particularly indicated. Longer-term follow-up will also assess the percentages of biochemical recurrences (BCR) in the two groups.
Interventions
PROCEDUREAugmented reality robot-assited radical prostatectomy
Robot assisted radical prostatectomy using the Da Vinci surgical robot system (XI model; Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, Calif) and a port device (Alexis; Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, Calif) system for prostate extraction. Virtual image of the prostate will be overlapped onto the endoscopic view of the Da Vinci surgical robot system using the TilePro system.
DEVICEMixed reality intraoperative frozen section analysis
Microsoft Hololens head-mounted display system will be used for inking prostate margins during intraoperative frozen section analysis
PROCEDURERobot-assited radical prostatectomy
Robot assisted radical prostatectomy using the Da Vinci surgical robot system (XI model; Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, Calif) and a port device (Alexis; Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, Calif) system for prostate extraction.
Sponsors
European Institute of Oncology
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Untreated, biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate Age ≥18 years European Association of Urology (EAU) low or intermediate risk prostate cancer: * PSA≤20 ng/ml * cT≤2b * International Society for Urological Pathology \[ISUP\] grade group≤III Written informed consent provided for participation in the trial International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5)≥20 No contraindications for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)
Exclusion criteria
Any prior therapy for prostate cancer European Association of Urology (EAU) high risk prostate cancer: * PSA\>20 ng/ml or * cT\>2b or * ISUP grade group\>III International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5)\<20 Prostate cancer with sarcomatoid or spindle cell or neuroendocrine small cell components Morbidity that would limit compliance with study protocols Controindications to perform mpMRI
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Positive surgical margins | Time zero | Pathological examination of positive surgical margins according to the criteria of the prostate consensus working group |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Surgical time | Time zero | Total operative time (mins) will we measured from skin incision to skin closure |
| Nerve-sparing approach | Time zero | Rates of nerve-sparing approaches between groups will be evaluated according to the Tewari et al. scale |
| Erectile function | 3-6-12 months after surgery | Erectile function recovery will be measured with the International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire |
Countries
Italy
Contacts
Primary ContactStefano Luzzago, MD
Backup ContactFrancesco A Mistretta, MD
Outcome results
None listed