Skip to content

Auditory and Visual Noise as Possible Non-pharmacological Treatment of ADHD in School Children

Auditory and Visual Noise as Possible Non-pharmacological Treatment of ADHD in School Children

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06057441
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-09-28
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-06-01
Last updated
2025-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Brief summary

The goal of this study is to compare the influence of visual and auditory white noise on performance in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can auditory white noise stimulation affect cognitive performance? * Can visual white pixel noise affect cognitive performance? Participants will complete two eye tracking tasks under different sensory noise stimulation. Researchers will compare the ADHD group with a group of typically developing children to see if the noise influences the groups differently and if it has the potential to affect the performance of the ADHD group, to reach the level of the control group.

Detailed description

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most frequent childhood disorders with an estimated prevalence of about 5%. Multimodal treatment is recommended in both national and international guidelines of ADHD care, but most patients only receive pharmacological treatment, sometimes in combination with parent training. As such, the most common treatment approach today is stimulant medication, e.g., methylphenidate. However, there are insufficient understanding about several aspects of medical treatment. For example, it is not evident that medication improves learning processes and the best dosage for cognitive functioning and adapted school behavior differs. Original findings from our research group shows that auditory noise has the possibility of enhancing cognitive performance in inattentive children without diagnosis as well as children with an ADHD diagnosis. One study found that the benefit of noise was in parity with, or even larger than, the benefit of pharmacological ADHD treatment on two cognitive tasks. The theory about noise benefit is thoroughly described by Sikström and Söderlund (2007). If auditory or visual noise, as suggested by the present project, could be a complement, or an alternative, to stimulant medication it could fundamentally change the treatment of ADHD and the school situation for those children. The aims of this study are to: i) evaluate the effects of auditory white noise and visual white pixel noise on cognitive performance during two eye tracking tasks, ii) compare effects between ADHD and control groups ii) link noise benefit to specific traits.

Interventions

DEVICEAuditory noise stimulation

Auditory white noise stimulation delivered at 78dB through earphones

DEVICEVisual noise stimulation

Visual white pixel noise stimulation, backgound pixel noise visible at computer screen

Sponsors

Lund University
CollaboratorOTHER
Region Skane
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will be recruited from Child and Adolescent Psychiatry in Lund. Typically developing children (TDC) will be recruited from schools. All participants will perform a cross over control study. Participants will perform the entire test battery at one occasion, containing no noise, auditory white noise and visual white pixel noise (two levels). Participants in the ADHD group will perform the tests unmedicated. The order of the noise stimulation and no noise, as well as the order of the tasks, will be randomized over participants.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children and adolescents with a diagnosis of ADHD and control children without a diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

* Intellectual disability * Psychosis * Severe depression or anxiety * The need of an interpreter to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inhibitory controlSix monthsInhibitory control is the ability to suppress nonproductive behaviors and cognitive processing and will be measured through the eye tracking tasks (PF and MGS) in the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
SNAPSix monthsThe SNAP rating scale is an assessment tool for traits of hyperactivity and inattention in ADHD (Swanson et al., 2012). Will be filled out by legal guardians of the participants.
5-15RSix monthsThe 5-15R assessment is aimed at legal guardians of the participants and consists of 181 claims that evaluates motor and cognitive performance in children aged 5 to 15 as well as a psychiatric assessment (Kadesjö et al., 2017)

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026