Skip to content

Anatomical and Functional Outcome of PSG Vs BMG for Urethral Substitution in Long Segment Anterior Urethral Strictures

Anatomical and Functional Outcome of Penile Skin Graft Versus Buccal Mucosal Graft for Urethral Substitution in Long Segment Anterior Urethral Strictures

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06056856
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-09-28
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2023-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Urethral Stricture, Male

Keywords

urethral stricture, urethroplasty, BMG, PSG, penile skin

Brief summary

This study aims to compare the penile skin graft and buccal mucosal graft for substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach.

Detailed description

Since previous studies were: * Retrospective and very few were prospective randomized studies * Some studies were done on lichen sclerosis cases that have an adverse effect on the PSG outcome. * The follow-up duration was longer for PSG patients. * Stricture length was usually longer for PSG cases. This study aims to compare the PSG and BMG for substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach. The investigators hypothesize that: ❶ Conducting a well-designed prospective, randomized study can help identify which technique is better than the other. ❷ Using the one-side dorsal approach can improve the outcomes of both techniques and identify their advantages and disadvantages.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPenile skin graft substituttion urethroplasty

substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach

PROCEDUREBuccal Mucosal Graft substitution urethroplasty

substitution of long anterior urethral strictures using one-sided dorsal perineal approach

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Two-arm parallel assignment. The first arm will be operated using penile skin grafts, The second arm will be operated using buccal mucosal grafts.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
5 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The study will include patients with long segment anterior urethral stricture (\>2 cm).

Exclusion criteria

* Urethro-cutaneous fistula, urethral abscess or diverticulum. * A scarred and unsalvageable urethral plate or scarred perineum. * Lichen sclerosis (Balanitis xerotica obliterans). * Unhealthy/unavailable buccal mucosa.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The degree of urethral lumen patency.through study completion, an average of 1 year.Patent urethra as evidenced by uroflowmetry and retrograde urethrography +/- urethroscopy

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lower urinary tract symptoms improvement6 monthslower urinary tract symptoms as assessed by the international prostate symptom score, ranging from 0 to 35, where scores from 0-7 are mild, from 8-19 are moderate, from 20-35 are severe symptoms.
Erectile function assessment6 monthssexual function as assessed by the international index of erectile function-5 questionnaire, ranging from 5-25, where 22-25 is normal, 17-21 is mild ED, 12-16 is mild to moderate ED, 8-11 is moderate ED, and 5-7 is severe ED.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed Anwar, A. lecturer
m0anwar2005@gmail.com00201155678282
Backup ContactAhmed Alrefaey, lecturer
urologydepartment@azhar.edu.eg00201149394121

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026