Skip to content

The SIR-POBA Bypass Trial

SIRrolimus-coated Versus Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) in Lower Extremity Autologous Venous Bypass Stenosis - The SIR-POBA Bypass Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06056193
Enrollment
0
Registered
2023-09-28
Start date
2023-09-20
Completion date
2027-10-01
Last updated
2025-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bypass Complication, Claudication, Intermittent, Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Femoropopliteal Artery Occlusion, Femoropopliteal Stenosis, Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Keywords

Autologous Vein Bypass, Endovascular Revascularization

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare plain old balloon angioplasty with sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty in patients with an infrainguinal venous bypass stenosis. The main question we aim to answer is, how patency is affected by each of the randomised treatment options.

Detailed description

This clinical trial will be conducted at our Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery at the University Hospital of Salzburg. Patients will be randomized into one of the two treatment options (plain old ballon angioplasty versus sirolimus coated balloon angioplasty). The recruitment phase is calculated for two years with a planned follow-up of 2 years. Follow-up data will be collected to answer the endpoints and will include all available follow-ups to monitor the bypass up to 2 years after the procedure. Typically, follow-up visits will be conducted at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after the procedure.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBalloon Angioplasty

Revascularisation procedures will be performed according to randomised list

Sponsors

MedAlliance Swiss Medical Technology
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Paracelsus Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age at least 18 years * Informed consent with signature * Rutherford category 2 or 3 (in terms of lifestyle-limiting moderate or severe claudication symptomatology) or chronic critical ischemia (Rutherford 4-6) * Venous bypass stenosis requiring intervention * Confirmed inflow * At least 1 crural outflow vessel

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women * Active infection or sepsis * Patients currently participating in another clinical trial * Unconfirmed inflow * Intolerance to sirolimus * Coagulopathy * Radiotherapy * Patients on immunosuppressive therapy * Non-dialysis renal insufficiency (eGFR \< 45 ml/min/1.73m2) * Use of potent CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inhibitors (such as ketoconazole, Voriconazole, itraconazole, erythromycin, telithromycin, or clarithromycin) or strong CYP3A4 and/or P-gp inducers (such as rifampin or rifabutin).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Primary Lesion Target Patency of the venous bypass stenosis2 yearsThe incidence of patency will be analysed after reopening the stenosis of the venous bypass.

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026