Liver Metastasis Colon Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to learn about the combination of immune boosting drugs and irreversible electroporation (IRE) in patients with colon cancer that has spread to the liver (metastasis). The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. to document the rate of complications associated with combining IRE with immune boosting drugs. 2. After one liver metastasis is treated with IRE and immune boosting drugs, what is the change in the size of the non-IRE-treated liver metastases? 3. What is the immune response (measured in a blood sample) when IRE is combined with one or two types of immune boosting drugs?
Detailed description
Single-centre pilot study of the use of IRE for the treatment of 12 patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases to assess feasibility and gain preliminary data to inform the design of a larger study.
Interventions
COMBINATION_PRODUCTIRE plus checkpoint inhibitor
Nivolumab: Patients will receive 240 mg nivolumab (dissolved in 250 mL NaCl 0.9%) administered intravenously over 30 minutes. The first dose will take place one or two days before the IRE treatment. The second and third doses will be given 2 and 4 weeks post-IRE. Bloodwork will be done just prior to each treatment.
COMBINATION_PRODUCTIRE plus Checkpoint Inhibitor plus CpG-ODN
Patients will receive 240 mg nivolumab as above and also receive 8 mg of CpG-ODN dissolved in 1 mL normal saline administered peritumorally just before the IRE treatment. Three or four electrodes will be placed using a combination of ultrasound and CT guidance in preparation for treatment. Then using the electrodes as landmarks, injection of ¼ or 1/3 cc of the CpG solution will be performed near each of the 3 or 4 electrodes to achieve a peritumoral administration of the drug. IRE is performed in the CT scanner. Patients will receive a general anesthetic and an ultrasound will be performed to locate the designated metastasis. Ultrasound-guided electrode placement (3 or 4 depending on cancer size, shape, and location) will be performed by interventional radiologist Dr. Chris Wall and the IRE device will be activated and used as per the technique of Martin et al.
Sponsors
University of Saskatchewan
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
This will be a pilot study examining 6 patients treated with IRE and checkpoint inhibitor (first 6, non-randomized) and 6 patients treated with IRE and checkpoint inhibitor and CpG
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Biopsy-proven colorectal liver metastases with at least one measuring \< 3.5 cm in diameter and accessible to percutaneous IRE such that a complete ablation of the lesion is possible. 2. Prior resection of the colorectal cancer primary. 3. The imaging has been reviewed in multi-disciplinary Rounds and the colorectal liver metastases have been deemed unresectable. 4. Patient has undergone chemotherapy and has not converted to resectable disease. 5. Radiologic evidence of stable disease for at least two months on systemic therapy for colorectal cancer (may have had prior partial response or disease progression) 6. Microsattelite instability (MSI)-stable or mismatch-proficient tumors 7. Patient has HLA phenotype of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) A1 or HLA A2. 8. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Exclusion criteria
1. Size of the metastasis being treated with IRE \> 3.2 cm or \< 2 cm. 2. Size of any non-IRE-treated liver metastasis \> 4 cm 3. Pregnancy 4. Major comorbid disease 5. Active autoimmune disease 6. Bone or brain or peritoneal metastases. 7. MSI High disease 8. Patients with cardiac arrhythmia other than rate controlled atrial fibrillation. 9. Metal implant that cannot be removed within 10 cm of the area to be treated. 10. Peritoneal disease. 11. Poor performance status 12. Cirrhosis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Complications | 30 days | Complications (Clavien-Dindo classification of complications) at 30 days. The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Complications involves assigning a numbered classification to each complication, from 1-5, with 1 being a complication without need for any intervention required to 5 which is death of the patient. (a higher number indicates a higher severity). This is a validated measure in use for over 25 years. |
| Abscopal effect: percent change in non-treated colorectal liver metastasis. | 3 months from the time of IRE | Two radiologists (one diagnostic and the other interventional) will examine the scans of all patients. They will select a colorectal metastasis from the scan just before the intervention that is between 2-3.2 cm in maximal diameter, accessible to percutaneous ablation, and treatable according to the interventional radiologist's opinion. Another metastasis, with a maximal diameter of less than 4 cm, will be selected to monitor for the abscopal effect (reduction in size of a colorectal liver metastasis that was not treated with IRE). After 3 months, the radiologists will review the imaging again. They will assess the treatment mass area for any contrast uptake indicating incomplete ablation. The second metastasis will be measured in the same dimensions as before treatment. The difference in maximal diameter of the second metastasis will be calculated as (diameter before IRE - diameter after IRE) / diameter before IRE and expressed as a percentage. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor-specific immune response: distribution on flow-cytometry plot | Day 8 | Distribution of Carcinoembryonic (CEA)-specific CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, type-1 and 2 macrophages (M1 and M2), regulatory T (Treg) cells on the flow-cytometry plot. |
| Tumor-specific immune response: serum cytokine concentrations | Day 8 | Interleukin(IL)-2, Interferon (IFN)-α, IFN-γ, IL-10 and Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β. |
| Tumor-specific immune response: distribution on flow-cytometry plot. | Day 14 | Distribution of Carcinoembryonic (CEA)-specific CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, type-1 and 2 macrophages (M1 and M2), regulatory T (Treg) cells on the flow-cytometry plot. |
| Tumor-specific immune response: serum cytokin concentrations | Day 14 | Interleukin(IL)-2, Interferon (IFN)-α, IFN-γ, IL-10 and Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β. |
| Tumor-specific immune response | Day 30 | Interleukin(IL)-2, Interferon (IFN)-α, IFN-γ, IL-10 and Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)-β. |
| Progression-free survival | 1 year | Progression-free survival will be determined based on the CT scan conducted after one year. To prove the absence of progression, there should be no contrast uptake in the area that was treated with IRE one year prior, AND the maximal diameter of the second lesion (not treated with IRE) should have increased by less than 10%. |
| Quality of life questionnaire | baseline | Quality of life using FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) questionnaire, a 27-item questionnaire, each item to be rated 1-5. The scores are totalled and total scores range from 0-108, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. |
Contacts
Primary ContactMike AJ Moser, MD, MSc
Backup ContactShahid Ahmed, MD
Outcome results
None listed