Skip to content

Validity of Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Muscular Invasion of Bladder Cancer

Validity of Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Muscular Invasion of Bladder Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06046469
Enrollment
55
Registered
2023-09-21
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2024-03-01
Last updated
2023-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Cancer

Brief summary

The aim of this work is to compare validity between CT and MRI in detecting muscular invasion in Patients with bladder cancer.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTCT with contrast

CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMRI pelvis

MRI pelvis with contrast

PROCEDURETURBT

transurethral resection of bladder tumor

Sponsors

Menoufia University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with urinary bladder mass

Exclusion criteria

* bleeding tendency ,patients had chemo , radiotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
which is better to detect muscular invasion in bladder cancer CT vs MRI1 monththe radiological staging of CT and MRI compared to histopathological staging

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactABDULRHMAN IS ELKHOULY, bachelor
abdo.elkholy20@yahoo.com01010054452

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026