Myopia
Conditions
Keywords
Refractive Errors, Eye Diseases
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to compare subjective ratings of lens handling at insertion for a monthly replacement lens versus a daily disposable lens in habitual soft lens wearers.
Detailed description
This was a non-dispensing, randomized, double-masked, crossover study. Participants wore 2 different contact lenses bilaterally over 4 study visits, all conducted on the same day. Estimated duration of involvement for each participant was 4 hours.
Interventions
Daily disposable contact lens for 90 minutes
Monthly replacement contact lens for 90 minutes
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Were 17 to 40 years of age and have full legal capacity to volunteer; 2. Had read and signed an information consent letter; 3. Were willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; 4. Were habitual daily wearers of spherical single vision soft contact lenses to correct for distance vision in each eye 5. Were correctable to a visual acuity of 20/20 or better (in each eye) with sphero-cylindrical subjective refraction; 6. Had an astigmatism of ≤ 0.75DC in subjective refraction; 7. Could be fit with the study contact lenses with a power between -1.00 and -6.00DS; this translates to best corrected vision sphere refraction that vertexes to a CL power between -1.00 and -6.00 (inclusive) at screening visit. 8. Demonstrated an acceptable fit with the study lenses.
Exclusion criteria
1. Had taken part in another clinical research study within the last 14 days; 2. Were currently habitual wearers of toric, multifocal or monovision lenses. 3. Had worn any rigid contact lenses in the past 6 months 4. Were an extended lens wearer (i.e., sleeping with their lenses) 5. Had a difference of ≥1.5 D in best vision sphere subjective refraction between eyes; 6. Had amblyopia and/or distance strabismus/binocular vision problem; 7. Had any known active ocular disease, allergies and/or infection; 8. Had a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 9. Were using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 10. Had a known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study; 11. Had undergone refractive error surgery or intraocular surgery; 12. Were a member of CORE directly involved in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Handling at Insertion | Immediately after lens application | Participants completed subjective ratings of the ease of application of the study lenses to eye immediately after lens application on a 0-100 integer scale, where 100=very easy and 0=very difficult. |
Countries
Canada
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Overall Study All participants who were dispensed lenses and successfully completed the study | 30 |
| Total | 30 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Overall Study | — |
|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 23.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4 | — |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | — Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 26 Participants | — |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 4 Participants | — |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 30 | 0 / 30 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 30 | 0 / 30 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 30 | 0 / 30 |
Outcome results
Lens Handling at Insertion
Participants completed subjective ratings of the ease of application of the study lenses to eye immediately after lens application on a 0-100 integer scale, where 100=very easy and 0=very difficult.
Time frame: Immediately after lens application
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control Lens | Lens Handling at Insertion | 83 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16 |
| Test Lens | Lens Handling at Insertion | 93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 9 |