Skip to content

Comparing a Monthly Replacement Lens Versus a Daily Disposable Lens

Comparing Clariti Elite Versus Proclear 1 Day

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06046209
Enrollment
30
Registered
2023-09-21
Start date
2023-09-28
Completion date
2023-11-22
Last updated
2024-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Keywords

Refractive Errors, Eye Diseases

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to compare subjective ratings of lens handling at insertion for a monthly replacement lens versus a daily disposable lens in habitual soft lens wearers.

Detailed description

This was a non-dispensing, randomized, double-masked, crossover study. Participants wore 2 different contact lenses bilaterally over 4 study visits, all conducted on the same day. Estimated duration of involvement for each participant was 4 hours.

Interventions

Daily disposable contact lens for 90 minutes

DEVICETest Lens

Monthly replacement contact lens for 90 minutes

Sponsors

Centre for Ocular Research & Education, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
CooperVision, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Were 17 to 40 years of age and have full legal capacity to volunteer; 2. Had read and signed an information consent letter; 3. Were willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule; 4. Were habitual daily wearers of spherical single vision soft contact lenses to correct for distance vision in each eye 5. Were correctable to a visual acuity of 20/20 or better (in each eye) with sphero-cylindrical subjective refraction; 6. Had an astigmatism of ≤ 0.75DC in subjective refraction; 7. Could be fit with the study contact lenses with a power between -1.00 and -6.00DS; this translates to best corrected vision sphere refraction that vertexes to a CL power between -1.00 and -6.00 (inclusive) at screening visit. 8. Demonstrated an acceptable fit with the study lenses.

Exclusion criteria

1. Had taken part in another clinical research study within the last 14 days; 2. Were currently habitual wearers of toric, multifocal or monovision lenses. 3. Had worn any rigid contact lenses in the past 6 months 4. Were an extended lens wearer (i.e., sleeping with their lenses) 5. Had a difference of ≥1.5 D in best vision sphere subjective refraction between eyes; 6. Had amblyopia and/or distance strabismus/binocular vision problem; 7. Had any known active ocular disease, allergies and/or infection; 8. Had a systemic condition that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 9. Were using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may affect a study outcome variable; 10. Had a known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study; 11. Had undergone refractive error surgery or intraocular surgery; 12. Were a member of CORE directly involved in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lens Handling at InsertionImmediately after lens applicationParticipants completed subjective ratings of the ease of application of the study lenses to eye immediately after lens application on a 0-100 integer scale, where 100=very easy and 0=very difficult.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overall Study
All participants who were dispensed lenses and successfully completed the study
30
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverall Study
Age, Continuous23.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 300 / 30
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Lens Handling at Insertion

Participants completed subjective ratings of the ease of application of the study lenses to eye immediately after lens application on a 0-100 integer scale, where 100=very easy and 0=very difficult.

Time frame: Immediately after lens application

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control LensLens Handling at Insertion83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Test LensLens Handling at Insertion93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026