Skip to content

Intrauterine Device Versus Uterine Artery Embolization for Adenomyosis

Intrauterine Device Versus Uterine Artery Embolization for Adenomyosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Therapeutic Efficacy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06043583
Enrollment
56
Registered
2023-09-21
Start date
2023-07-21
Completion date
2025-07-31
Last updated
2023-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adenomyosis

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the therapeutic efficacy of intrauterine device and uterine artery embolization for uterine adenomyosis.

Detailed description

Screening * History, Physical examination * Laboratory test (Hemoglobin) / MRI * Pictorial blood loss assessment chart * Symptom/Quality of life score Intervention * Intrauterine device or uterine artery embolization * Adverse event montoring Follow-up visit #1 (1 month) * Vital signs * blood test (Hemoglobin) / Ultrasound * Adverse event monitoring Follow-up visit #2 (3 month) • MRI only for embolization patients Follow-up visit #3 (6 months) * Blood test (Hemoglobin) / Ultrasound * Pictorial blood loss assessment chart * Symptom/Quality of life score Follow-up visit #4 (12months) * Blood test (Hemoglobin) / Ultrasound * Pictorial blood loss assessment chart * Symptom/Quality of life score

Interventions

PROCEDUREIntrauterine device

The vagina is visually inspected to check the size and position of the uterus. The speculum is inserted into the vagina. The IUD is placed inside the uterus and then the strings are cut.

The right common femoral artery is punctured under ultrasound guidance and a 5F vascular sheath is inserted into the Rt common femoral artery. A 5F catheter was inserted into the internal iliac artery, and a 2.0F microcatheter is advanced into the uterine artery. Embolization is performed using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). One third (20 mL) of a 60-mL mixture comprising 150-250-µm PVA particles was injected at the beginning of embolization into each uterine artery, followed by injection of at least two thirds (40 mL) to all (60 mL) of a mixture comprising 250-355- µm PVA particles and finally completion with 355-500- µm PVA particles. Embolization was performed until complete cessation of blood flow in the ascending uterine artery for 10 heart beats.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
19 Years to 48 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1\. Women with symptomatic fibroids (age: 19 - 48 years old) 2. Hemglobin \< 12g/dL, 3. Symptoms of adenomysis (Menorrhagia, Dysmenorrhea)

Exclusion criteria

1\. Gynecologic malignancy 2. Ongoing infection or inflammation 3. Coagulopathy (platelet \< 50,000 or INR \> 1.5) 4. Concomitant endometriosis 5. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hemoglobin levelHemoglobin level at 6 and 12 months after each procedureHemoglobin as an indicator of menstrual bleeding

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC)0,6,12 monthsPictorial blood loss assessment chart: a semi-quantitative method for evaluation of menstrual blood loss (\>100 considered as heavy mentrual blood)
Visual analogue scale0,6,12 monthsVisual analogue scale: a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between no pain and worst pain.
Symptom and quality of life score questionnaire0,6,12 monthsSymptom and quality of life score questionnaire: a questionnaire developed to objectively assess symptom severity and quality of life in relation to uterine adenomyosis before and after procedure
Uterine volume0,12 months

Countries

South Korea

Contacts

Primary ContactMan-Deuk Kim
mdkim@yuhs.ac82-10-8625-2197

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026