Skip to content

Effect of Double Surgical Glove on Comfort, Sensitivity and Dexterity

Comparison of the Effect of Glove Number on Comfort, Sensitivity, and Dexterity in the Use of Double Surgical Gloves

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06042088
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-09-18
Start date
2023-09-03
Completion date
2023-11-03
Last updated
2023-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical Gloves

Keywords

Surgical gloves, Comfort, Dexterity, Sensitivity

Brief summary

This clinical trial aims to test the effect of double surgical gloves worn in different sizes on the surgical team's comfort, sensitivity, and dexterity.

Detailed description

The purpose of using surgical gloves is to create a protective barrier against blood-borne pathogens. According to studies, gloves can puncture during surgical procedures. Many studies recommend wearing double gloves. However, the World Health Organization reported that in the guideline for surgical site infections published in 2018, there is not enough evidence for wearing double or single gloves to prevent surgical site infections. However, he recommends that the surgical team prefer to use double gloves to protect themselves against punctures. Although wearing double gloves is considered to be positive in terms of patient and employee safety, it is not preferred by the surgical team in some cases. The sense of touch and sensitivity of the human hand is at the center of surgical procedures. Finger pulp is extremely sensitive and contains many sensory receptors. Placing a barrier, such as a glove, between these sensory receptors and the touched surface may prevent tactile sensitivity in surgical applications. In addition to the advantages of double gloves in terms of patient and employee safety, there are disadvantages such as reduced dexterity and touch sensitivity. In the literature, it has been determined that there are few and old studies examining the effects of double glove use on performance and comfort. Therefore, this study, it was aimed to compare the effects of double surgical gloves worn in different procedures or usage habits (double gloves, large and small gloves) on the comfort, sensitivity, and dexterity of the surgical team. The study will conduct as a prospective randomized controlled trial. After obtaining verbal and written consent from the participant, the study will conduct with various data collection forms. These forms are; the introductory information form, surgical glove evaluation form, and Visual Analogue Scale. Participants will randomize. After randomization, participants will be included in one of four groups. All procedures will be applied to participants in all groups. Group I (n=20), Group II (n=20), Group III (n=20), Group IV (n=20). Procedure A: Double gloves, participants will wear both gloves in their surgical glove size. Procedure B: Double gloves, participants will wear their own glove number and half a size bigger glove on top. Procedure C: Double gloves, participants will wear a half-size big glove and their own glove number on top. Procedure D: Participants will wear one glove (control procedure). Open surgeries with a duration of 90-120 minutes will be preferred for evaluation.

Interventions

OTHERRegular Size Glove and Bigger One

Different sizes of surgical gloves will be worn by participants

Sponsors

Ankara Medipol University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Taking part in the surgical team Six months or more of surgical experience

Exclusion criteria

Latex allergic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from comfort, sensitivity, and dexterity after 90-120 min.After 90-120 minutesIn this section, the degree of comfort, sensitivity, and dexterity. This status will be evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale. In Visual Analogue Scale we use between 0-10 point (0= most uncomfortable/ most insensitivity/ most indexterity, 10=most comfort/ most sensitivity/ most dexterity).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026