Skip to content

Pilot Evaluation of the Thriving Mamas Programme

Pilot Evaluation of the Thriving Mamas Programme for Adolescent Perinatal Mental Health

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06040359
Enrollment
141
Registered
2023-09-15
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2024-09-15
Last updated
2025-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perinatal Mental Health

Keywords

Adolescent mental health, Maternal mental health

Brief summary

The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility, appropriateness, and acceptability of a mental health prevention intervention among adolescents during pregnancy and the year after birth (perinatal period) in Kenya and Mozambique. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the intervention feasible, acceptable, appropriate, and delivered/received with high fidelity, to adolescent girls, their friends/family members and service providers? * Are the implementation strategies acceptable, appropriate, feasible to all relevant stakeholders? * What impact does the intervention have on adolescent mothers' mental health? * What impact does the intervention have on adolescent mothers' social, economic, and education outcomes? Participants will: * Participate in nine individual and group sessions focused on improving mental and perinatal health literacy and increasing life skills * Receive standard perinatal care Researchers will compare findings with girls receiving standard perinatal care only to see if the intervention has an impact on adolescents' mental health, social, economic and education outcomes.

Interventions

OTHERThe Thriving Mamas programme

Enhanced antenatal course plus usual perinatal care

OTHERUsual care

Usual perinatal care

Sponsors

Aga Khan University
CollaboratorOTHER
Centro Internacional para Saude Reprodutiva Mocambique
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
UK Research and Innovation
CollaboratorOTHER
King's College London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Mentor mothers: (A) aged 20 years or older; (B) female; (C) experience of pregnancy and/or parenting; and (D) live within the study site * Adolescent girls: (A) up to 28 weeks pregnant; and (B) aged 15-19 years * Friends/family members: (A) identified by an adolescent or young woman participating in the study; (B) participation agreed by other participating girls; and (C) aged 18 years or older

Exclusion criteria

* Mentor mothers will be excluded from participating if they are unable to attend training or deliver the intervention sessions * Adolescent girls will be excluded from the study if they are unable to provide informed consent or are unable to participate in the intervention, due to existing health conditions * Friends/family members will not be excluded so long as they meet inclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intervention Feasibility10-12 weeks post-partumFeasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM); Subjective report of feasibility of intervention; measures the extent to which a new treatment, or an innovation, can be successfully used or carried out within a given agency or setting. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better
Intervention Acceptability10-12 weeks post-partumAcceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM); Subjective report of acceptability of intervention; A 5-item scale that measures the perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better
Intervention Appropriateness10-12 weeks post-partumIntervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM); Subjective report of appropriateness of intervention; A 5-item scale that measures the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation or evidence-based practice for a given practice setting, provider, or consumer, and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better
Intervention FidelityThrough intervention delivery, an average of 24 weeksEnhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors (ENACT); subjective report of provider fidelity and perception of care; Minimum=0; Maximum=13; higher score is better

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in mental health attitudesBaseline and immediately after provider trainingSocial Distance Scale (SDS); The SDS measures the acceptability of different degrees of social distance and, by inference, the attitude of the respondent to the person with the condition; Minimum=1, Maximum=96; higher score is better
Change in adolescent pregnancy attitudesBaseline and immediately after provider trainingStudy-specific attitudes towards adolescent pregnancy survey; Minimum=4, Maximum=20; lower score is better
Provider competencyImmediately after provider trainingStudy-specific single 10-point scale to assess provider ability to deliver the intervention; Minimum=0, Maximum=10; higher score is better
Recruitment ratepre-interventionProportion of adolescents providing consent to participate in the study
Cost of interventionthrough study completion, an average of 24 weeksTotal and average cost of the intervention per participant
Change in adolescent depressionthrough study completion, an average of 24 weeksPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); Nine-item screening tool which assesses depression symptoms according to clinical criteria. Minimum=0, Maximum=27. A score ≥10 indicates moderate to severe depression.
Change in adolescent anxietythrough study completion, an average of 24 weeksGeneralised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7); Seven-item screening tool which assesses anxiety symptoms according to clinical criteria. Minimum=0, Maximum=21. A score ≥10 indicates moderate to severe anxiety.
Change in adolescent quality of lifethrough study completion, an average of 24 weeksWHO Quality of Life brief version (WHOQOL-BREF); 26-item scale assesses a respondent's perceived quality of life across four domains: physical health; psychological; social relationships; and environment. Total minimum=25, Total maximum=125. Higher scores indicate greater quality of life in a particular domain.
Training FeasibilityImmediately after provider trainingFeasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM); Subjective report of feasibility of intervention; measures the extent to which a new treatment, or an innovation, can be successfully used or carried out within a given agency or setting. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better
Adolescent parenting competencythrough study completion, an average of 24 weeksParenting Sense of Competency Scale; 17-item scale to measure adolescents' perceived parenting abilities. Minimum=17, Maximum=102. Higher scores indicate greater perceived competence.
Perinatal appointment attendancethrough study completion, an average of 24 weeksNumber of participants attending antenatal appointments
Referral uptake10-12 weeks post-partumProportion of adolescents attending referral appointments
Change in infant vaccinationBaseline and 10-12 weeks post-partumNumber of participants intending to or having had their babies vaccinated
Change in breastfeedingBaseline and 10-12 weeks post-partumNumber of participants intendng to or are currently breastfeeding
Change in intended time to next pregnancyBaseline and 10-12 weeks post-partumStudy-specific health behaviours questionnaire to assess intended or actual contraceptive Nuimber of participants that want more children who intend to wait at least 15 months before next pregnancy
Change in contraceptive useBaseline and 10-12 weeks post-partumNumber of participants intending to or currently using contraceptives to delay pregnancy
Change in perception of interventionBaseline and 10-12 weeks post-partumStudy-specific five-item measure assessing knowledge gained, interest in intervention, and support recieved; Minimum=0; Maximum=5; higher score is better
Change in adolescent social supportthrough study completion, an average of 24 weeksMultidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS); The MSPSS is a 12-item scale which measures social support from family, friends and significant others. Minimum=12, Maximum=84. Higher scores indicate greater social support.
Training AcceptabilityImmediately after provider trainingAcceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM); Subjective report of acceptability of intervention; A 5-item scale that measures the perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better
Training AppropriatenessImmediately after provider trainingIntervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM); Subjective report of appropriateness of intervention; A 5-item scale that measures the perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation or evidence-based practice for a given practice setting, provider, or consumer, and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. Minimum=5, Maximum=25; higher score is better
KnowledgeBaseline and immediately after provider trainingStudy-specific measure of mentor mothers' knowledge of issues regarding pregnancy, childbirth, caregiving, mental health, and referral pathways will be assessed using a study-specific quiz based upon the intervention manual; Minimum=0, Maximum=16; higher score is better

Countries

Kenya, Mozambique

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026