Skip to content

Effect of Atelocollagen Injection in Patients With Calcific Tendinitis

Effect of Atelocollagen Injection in Patients With Calcific Tendinitis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06040112
Enrollment
46
Registered
2023-09-15
Start date
2023-12-06
Completion date
2025-06-30
Last updated
2024-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atelocollagen, Calcific Tendinitis of Shoulder

Brief summary

Assess the clinical outcomes using atelocollagen injection in patients with calcific tendinitis.

Detailed description

Suitable participants based on the selection/exclusion criteria are randomly assigned to either the case group or the control group. Consent is given right before the procedure. Case group (Atelocollagen injection group): Ultrasound-guided barbotage followed by lidocaine and atelocollagen injection. Control group (Lidocaine injection group): Ultrasound-guided barbotage followed by lidocaine injection. Clinical outcomes will be assessed with functional scores on 6 months after injection.

Interventions

Tendoregen (Atelocollagen) injection

Sponsors

Hyungsuk Kim
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients in whom calcification of 5mm or more is observed in plain radiographs. 2. In cases where concomitant medication is administered continuously during the clinical trial period, patients who have verified the exact prescribed medication taken within the last week and agreed to maintain the same amount throughout the study period. 3. Individuals who have agreed to participate in this study and have given written consent themselves.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a medical history of infectious arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, tumors, or fractures. * Patients with hypersensitivity. * Patients with a history of anaphylactic reactions. * Patients with ongoing autoimmune diseases or a past medical history of such diseases, either in the patient or their family members. * Patients who are allergic to transplants. ⑥ Patients who are allergic to porcine (pig) proteins. ⑦ Patients deemed unsuitable for this trial based on the judgment of the trial administrator, such as those with mental illnesses. ⑧ Patients who have received intra-articular steroid or other injection treatments within one month prior to the procedure decision. ⑨ Patients who are on concomitant medications that include oral steroids.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Constant score (Shoulder function score)1, 3, 5 monthsThe Constant score is commonly used to evaluate the functional status of shoulder disorders and shows relatively high accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility. The evaluation is out of a total of 100 points: pain 15 points, daily activities 20 points, anterior elevation 10 points, lateral elevation 10 points, internal/external rotation each 10 points, and muscle strength 25 points

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026