Skip to content

Indocyanine Green for Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes In Comparison to ICG Plus Technetium in the Evaluation of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Indocyanine Green for Detection of Sentinel Lymph Nodes In Comparison to ICG Plus Technetium in the Evaluation of Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The IGNITE-V Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06039111
Acronym
IGNITE-V
Enrollment
58
Registered
2023-09-15
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vulvar Cancer

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to confirm prospectively if the use of near infrared-indocyanine green (NIR-ICG) alone offers similar accuracy and sensitivity to the gold standard dual technique for sentinel lymph node detection in early stage vulvar cancer.

Interventions

PROCEDUREICG alone

SLNs will be detected with ICG alone, labelled as such, and subsequent to that tested with Gamma probe for accuracy

Sponsors

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Lead SponsorOTHER
Juravinski Cancer Centre Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Adult women (18 years of age) with FIGO Stage IB (\> 1 mm depth of invasion) and small Stage II (4 cm) vulvar squamous cell carcinoma or cutaneous melanoma who are candidates for the Sentinel lymph node technique will be included (Negative clinical groin examination and/or imaging and primary unifocal vulvar tumor size of \< 4 cm).

Exclusion criteria

Women with a prior history of pelvic, vulvovaginal or inguinal radiation, with allergy or hypersensitivity to Technetium or ICG, or Bartholin gland cancer will be excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
false-negative rate of the detection technique using ICG alone compared to ICG and Technetium (Dual method) per groin2 yearsThis will be calculated as the number of groins for which positive SLN were missed using ICG alone; i.e. the number of groins for which ICG did not detect a positive SLN but was detected by ICG and Technetium, divided by the number of groins for which surgery was performed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1. The proportion of positive SLN detected by ICG for each groin divided by the total number of positive SLN detected using ICG and Technetium.2 yearsthe unit of analysis is the number of SLN for each groin.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTAndra Nica, MD
nica@hhsc.ca9053879495

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026