Skip to content

Caregiver Skills Training: Comparing Clinician Training Methods

Caregiver Skills Training: Comparing the Effectiveness of Training Clinicians Via Telehealth and In-Person Training

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06038799
Acronym
CST
Enrollment
22
Registered
2023-09-15
Start date
2023-09-15
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2025-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parenting

Keywords

Caregiver skills training, Staff training

Brief summary

Caregiver Skills Training (CST) is an evidence-based intervention for parents of young children with developmental disabilities that was developed through a collaboration between Autism Speaks and the World Health Organization. The intervention is typically offered by Facilitators who are trained and supervised by CST Master Trainers. This study seeks to use a remote training model to compare two training and supervision processes. One group, comprised of facilitators from rural settings, will be trained and supervised by two master trainers from the University of Pittsburgh using a remote training model. A second group, comprised of facilitators from an agency serving primarily low-income households and located near Pittsburgh, will be trained and supervised in a face-to-face manner. Both groups will initially receive ten 90-minute training sessions over a 2-month period and will subsequently receive 1 hour per week of supervision while conducting their first 12-session CST group. Outcome measures will include assessment of change in caregiver stress and didactic skills as well as improvement in each child's communication/social skills, functional skills, and overall behavior. Also added was an additional research question in which face-to-face CST sessions with remote CST sessions were compared.

Detailed description

There are two aspects to this study: First, the investigators will compare two training and supervision processes. One group, comprised of facilitators from rural settings, will be trained and supervised by two master trainers from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Center for Autism and Developmental Disorders (CADD). A second group, comprised of facilitators from an agency serving primarily low-income households and located near Pittsburgh, PA, will be trained and supervised in a face-to-face manner. Both groups will receive 15 hours of training spread over the course of 2-3 months (in summer 2023). The focus of these sessions will be to introduce and train staff on the CST model, ensure their understanding of the curriculum, and to help them gain proficiency in administration. During the training phase, both groups will practice administration of activities and will be provided feedback. The master trainers will also assist the newly trained facilitators in navigating recruitment and organization of their first CST groups. Upon initiation of the CST groups, facilitators will receive 1 hour of supervision per week, either in person or via TEAMS. Supervision will extend over the 9 group sessions and 3 home visits per family (fall 2023). These supervision sessions will allow the facilitators to ask questions, obtain feedback, and troubleshoot any challenges. The investigators will also collect pre and post measures (baseline and week 12) from the parents participating in the CST groups to determine if the type of training provided to the facilitators (face-to-face versus remote) impacted parent progress. We have also added an additional research question in which we compare face-to-face CST sessions with remote CST sessions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCaregiver Skills Training (CST)

The investigators are comparing the relative efficacy of CST between a CST group led by clinicians trained and supervised remotely versus a group led by clinicians trained an supervised face-to-face.

Sponsors

Autism Speaks
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pittsburgh
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Caregiver)

Masking description

Parents that receive Caregiver Skills Training will be unaware of whether their group leaders were trained/supervised remotely or face-to-face.

Intervention model description

The investigators will be comparing two types of training/supervision models. One will be provided remotely and one will be provided face-to-face. In addition, investigators will compare two types of treatment: face-to-face sessions versus remote sessions.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Parents who * Have a child ages 2-9 with a developmental disability and/or autism * Able to be served by one of the three UPMC sites * Able to attend 12 sessions. Group sessions are at the clinic site and the individual sessions may be done virtually or in person.

Exclusion criteria

* Parent()s does not speak / understand English. Given the nature of this study, we are unable to provide translation services.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from week 1 (baseline) to week 12 on the Caregivers Skills and Knowledge MeasureWeek 1 (baseline) versus week 12 (final visit)eEvaluates change in caregiver skills and knowledge related to session content as well as caregiver confidence. There are 28 skills questions (scored on a scale of 1-5) with a score range fomr 28-140 (with higher scores indicating greater skills). The Confidence scale consists of 9 items (scored 1-5) with scores ranging from 9-45. Higher scores indicate greater confidence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from week 1 (baseline) to week 12 on the Parenting Stress Index.Week 1 (baseline) versus week 12 (final visit)To assess parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, and child challenges. There are 36 items and 3 subscales (12 items per subscale). Subscales include Parent Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction, and Difficult Child. There is also a Total Stress Score. Each item is scored on a 1-5 scale. Range for each subscale is 12-60 points; Total Score is 36-180 points. Scores are converted to percentiles. Percentiles of 15-80 are typical stress; 81-89 are high stress; and \>89 are clinically significant stress. Higher percentiles indicate higher levels of stress.
Change from week 1 (baseline) to week 12 on the Social Communication Checklist (SCC)Week 1 (baseline) versus week 12 (final visit)To assess social communication abilities, specifically social engagement (15 items), expressive language form (15 items), expressive language function (15 items), receptive language (8 items) imitation (6 items, and pla (11 items). Items are scored on a 3-point scale (usually, = 3 points; sometimes, = 2 points; or rarely = 1 point). The range for all 70 items is 70-210 points. The higher the score, the greater the child's abilities.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026