Skip to content

Prospective Evaluation of AI R&D Tool in Adult Glioma and Other Primary Brain Tumours (PEAR-GLIO)

Prospective Evaluation of AI R&D Tool in Adult Glioma and Other Primary Brain Tumours (PEAR-GLIO)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06038760
Acronym
PEAR-GLIO
Enrollment
12
Registered
2023-09-15
Start date
2023-10-12
Completion date
2025-07-25
Last updated
2025-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Tumor, Ependymoma, Glioblastoma, Glioma, Malignant, Oligodendroglioma

Keywords

computer vision, cell culture, microtumor, functional testing, predictive biomarker, precision medicine, oncology, brain cancer

Brief summary

Pear Bio has developed a 3D microtumor assay and computer vision pipeline through which the response of an individual patient's tumor to different anti-cancer regimens can be tested simultaneously ex vivo. This study will recruit patients with primary brain tumors who are due to undergo surgery. Oncologists will be blinded to treatment response on the Pear Bio tool (the assay will be run in parallel with the patient's treatment). The primary objective of this study is to establish the ex vivo model and confirm whether approved therapies exhibit their intended mechanism of action in the model. Secondary objectives include correlating test results to patient outcomes, where available.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, observational pilot study that aims to determine the feasibility of using the Pear Bio tool in patients with primary solid brain tumors. Patients who are due to undergo clinically-mandated surgery will provide informed consent to donate excess tissue and a 40mL blood sample. The samples will be tested on the Pear Bio tool while the patient receives their standard of care treatment. As such, for this study, the result from the Pear Bio tool will not be used to inform the choice of treatment and the treating oncologist will be blinded to the assay results. The investigators will examine drug mechanism of action (MoA), differentiated response, and correlate that with outcomes seen in the patients treated in routine clinical practice.

Interventions

PROCEDUREResection

Patients undergo a resection from a lesion, and give 40mL of blood

Sponsors

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Ourotech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion: 1. Patient diagnosed with operable brain cancer, thought likely to be primary solid brain tumor on imaging (grade 2 - 3 meningioma; grade 1 - 4 tumors otherwise) or with histologically proven primary malignant solid brain tumor 2. Able to give written informed consent prior to admission to this study; 3. Female or male aged ≥18 years; 4. Patient consents to the use of their surgical sample and 40mL of whole blood for research purposes 5. Surgical sample and yields ≥0.4g for the study 6. Patient consents to providing histopathology data (e.g., confirmation of histological subtype as oligodendroglioma) and other pseudonymised health information including imaging, treatment and outcome data. Exclusion: 1. Inoperable or biopsy only 2. Suspected lymphoma or myeloma, or grade 1 meningioma 3. Preoperative haemoglobin levels below 120g/L 4. Patients who have already received chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy less than 30 days before date of surgery, unless as part of a clinical trial (requires per-patient sponsor approval) 5. Recurrence of cancer originating from a site other than the brain 6. Any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding that, in the investigator's opinion, gives reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that may affect the interpretation of the results, render the patient at high risk from treatment complications or interferes with obtaining informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Differentiated ex vivo treatment response2 weeksMeasurement of treatment response in the Pear Assay

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free survival correlation1 yearThe correlation between response in the Pear Bio system and PFS in patients

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Find correlations between ex vivo tumor culture or multi-omic biomarkers and real-world patient outcomes12 monthsTo correlate Pear assay results, biomarkers and outcomes
Culture success rate of tumor cells1 weekThe percentage of cultures in which ≥70% of viable tumor cells encapsulated post-isolation on day 0 are still alive on day 3 in the control cultures (no treatment) compared to the number of tumor samples successfully accepted at the study central lab.
Assess the correlation of omics biomarkers to patient PFS, ORR and/or OS12 monthsCorrelation between biomarkers and clinically relevant outcomes
Assess Pear Bio's assay ability to categorise patients for below average or above average overall survival (OS12 monthsCategorisation of patients into survival cohorts using the Pear assay
Culture rates success for immune cells1 weekThe percentage of cultures in which ≥70% of viable immune cells plated post-extraction on day 0 are still alive on day 3 in the control cultures (no treatment) compared to the number of blood samples successfully accepted at the study central lab.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026