Skip to content

Phase I Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Between CT-P41 and US-licensed Prolia in Healthy Male Subjects

A Randomized, Double-blind, Two-arm, Parallel Group, Single-dose, Phase I Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety Between CT-P41 and US-licensed Prolia in Healthy Male Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06037395
Enrollment
154
Registered
2023-09-14
Start date
2021-10-06
Completion date
2022-10-20
Last updated
2023-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Subject

Keywords

CT-P41

Brief summary

A Randomized, Double-blind, Two-arm, Parallel group, Single-dose, Phase I Study to Compare the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety between CT-P41 and US-licensed Prolia in Healthy Male Subjects

Detailed description

This study was a randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel group, single-dose, phase I study designed to compare PK, PD, safety, and immunogenicity between CT-P41 and US-licensed Prolia in healthy male subjects. Subjects were randomized into a 1:1 ratio to receive a single dose (60 mg) of either CT-P41 or US-licensed Prolia. The subjects were followed up for 253 days.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALCT-P41

a single 60 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection via pre-filled syringe (PFS)

a single 60 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection via pre-filled syringe (PFS)

Sponsors

Celltrion
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

A Randomized, Double-blind

Intervention model description

Two-arm, Parallel group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
28 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Healthy male subject, between the ages of 28 and 55 years, both inclusive 2. Subject had a body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m2, both inclusive, and a body weight between 50.0 and 99.9 kg, both inclusive, when rounded to the nearest tenth. 3. Subject with total serum calcium ≥ 8.5 mg/dL (≥ 2.125 mmol/L) and serum 25-OH vitamin D ≥ 20 ng/mL (≥ 50 nmol/L)

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject was a female. 2. Subject with a hypersensitivity to any component of denosumab or dry natural rubber (a derivative of latex). 3. Subject was confirmed or suspected with infection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) at screening, or had had contact with COVID-19 patient within 14 days from screening. 4. Subject had a medical history of and/or current medical condition that can have effect on the study. Details to be discussed with investigator as per Protocol. 1. Subjects with known risk factors for hypocalcaemia 2. Subjects with known intolerance to calcium or vitamin D supplements 3. Subjects with known infection with active hepatitis B, hepatitis C, human immunodeficiency virus, or syphilis 5. Subject had a history of and/or concurrent use of medications including any prior therapy that can have effect on the study. Details to be discussed with investigator as per Protocol. 6. Subjects have or had any therapy that might significantly affect bone metabolism

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AUCinfup to Day 253Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf)
AUClastup to Day 253Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last)
Cmaxup to Day 253maximum serum concentration (Cmax)

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026