Skip to content

Efficacy of Kerecis Omega 3 in Comparison to Clinical Standard Procedures

Efficacy of Kerecis Omega 3 Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Chronic Leg Ulcerations - a Randomized Trial With a New In-wound Split Design Approach

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06036485
Enrollment
0
Registered
2023-09-14
Start date
2023-05-01
Completion date
2023-05-01
Last updated
2024-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leg Ulcer

Brief summary

Chronic leg ulcerations are a great burden for patients and the medical system alike. Frequent outpatient consultations with associated treatment costs and travel costs for the patient as well as psychosocial burdens remain an unmet problem in chronic wound care. There is an increasing need for definitive treatment of especially chronic venous and multifactorial chronic leg ulceration where arterial intervention is not a treatment option. Minimal invasive surgical interventions that do not require skin grafting can be performed under local anesthesia in an outpatient setting even in multimorbid patients. Kerecis Omega3 Wound is intact decellularized fish skin. The fish skin sheets contain fat, protein, elastin, glycans and other natural skin elements and it can be an effective treatment option in chronic leg ulcerations and is licensed for this use as a medical product in Switzerland. However, limited data without inter-wound bias is available for the use of Kerecis Omega 3 in chronic leg ulcerations. In this study the investigators propose to investigate the efficacy of Kerecis Omega 3 according to objective wound surface measurements using standardized digital photographs in patients with chronic leg ulcerations. Efficacy will be evaluated against standard of care wound debridement.

Interventions

DEVICEKerecis Omega 3

Decellularized intact fish skin developed for the management of chronic wounds

Superficial sharp surgical debridement technique

Sponsors

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

1:1 in-wound split design with random allocation

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any chronic leg ulcer \> 4 weeks duration with delayed wound healing (reduction of wound surface of less than 40-50% within 4 weeks under adequate local therapy) without underlying treatable medical conditions * Ulcer area at between 5cm2 and 60cm2 * Bacterial swab sampling prior to study * Written study informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of Fish allergy or proven Fish allergy * Pregnant or breast-feeding women * Intention to become pregnant during the course of the study * Wound not suitable for dressing: inflammation, fibrin coatings * Inability to understand the study consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in ulcer surface area12 weeksChange in ulcer surface area as assessed by standardized photography and digital imaging.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in patient quality of life2, 4, 6 and 12 weeksChange in patient quality of life as assessed by the Wound-QoL questionnaire score, ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life.
Change in wound microbiota as assessed by alpha diversity of the microbial composition2, 4, 6 and 12 weeksChange in wound microbiota utilizing 16S-sequencing from wound swabs as assessed by alpha diversity of the microbial composition trough Shannon index, with higher scores indicating a more diversity of the species
Change in wound microbiota as assessed by beta diversity of the microbial composition2, 4, 6 and 12 weeksChange in wound microbiota utilizing 16S-sequencing from wound swabs as assessed by beta diversity of the microbial composition trough Shannon index, with higher scores indicating a more diversity of the species.
Change in ulcer surface area2, 4, 6 and 12 weeksChange in ulcer surface area as assessed by standardized photography and digital imaging.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of adverse events12 weeksCumulative incidence of treatment-related adverse events

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026