Skip to content

Effect of Whole Body Vibration Versus Core Stability Exercises on Balance and Muscle Strength in Children With Down Syndrome

Improvement of Whole Body Vibration and Core Stability Exercises on Muscle Strength in Down Syndrome Children

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06036069
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-09-13
Start date
2023-10-15
Completion date
2024-01-20
Last updated
2023-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Down Syndrome

Keywords

Children; Core Stability Exercises; Down Syndrome; Whole Body Vibration

Brief summary

Children had Down syndrome often have impaired balance and postural control and result as less active than their peers that can lead to reduced quality of life and movement skills. Effects of physical activity may be important in preventing falling risk and health consequences in those children

Detailed description

Sixty children from both genders (boys and girls) participated in this study, their ages ranged from 10 to 16 years and they were randomized into three groups of same number (A, B and C). Groups (A) received conventional physical therapy program, group (B) received the same conventional physical therapy program of group (A) and core stability exercises while group (C) received the same conventional physical therapy program of group (A and B) and whole body vibration exercise

Interventions

OTHERConventional physical therapy

* Standing with feet together while the therapist was sitting behind and manually locking the child knees. * Step standing with the therapist behind the child. * High step standing and trying to keep balanced. The child stood on exercise mattress. * Single leg stance unilateral standing with assistance. The child was standing on exercise mattress. * Standing on a declined surface by using wedge. The child was standing on wedge towards the descending direction. * Standing with manual locking of the knees. * Changing position. * Gait training. * Static and dynamic muscle contraction.

Sponsors

Ragaee Saeed Mahmoud
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Single (outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Randomized control study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 10 to 16 years. * Able to recognize commands given to them. * Understand our verbal command and encouragement. * Stand and walk independently without repeated falling.

Exclusion criteria

* Children with any neurological (signs of epilepsy and instability of atlantoaxial joint). * Musculoskeletal, or mobility disorders. * Cardiac anomalies. * Vision or hearing loss.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biodex Balance Systembefore intervention and after 12 weeks of interventionit is a reliable and objective assessment in order to quantify dynamic balance

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hand-held dynamometerbefore intervention and after 12 weeks of interventionIt is a portable device (Nicholas Manual Muscle Tester, Model 01160; Lafayette Instrument, Lafayette, IN), characterized as low-cost and convenient method

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026