Educational Activities
Conditions
Brief summary
I invite you to participate in the study entitled Use of debriefing as a training tool in simulation, of which Montserrat Faro-Basco is not the main researcher. The study is linked to the doctoral thesis Debriefing in clinical simulation, essential for the development of reflective professionals, which the same researcher is carrying out as part of the UVic-UCC Doctoral Program in Educational Innovation and Intervention. The aim of this study is: \- Analysis of the effectiveness of the structured debriefing session with the TeamGAINS tool The procedure to follow will consist of the recording of the debriefing for the subsequent analysis of the behaviors and attitudes of the participants in the session (teacher and students), through its viewing. Participation in this activity is voluntary and does not involve any harm or danger to your physical or mental health. You can refuse to participate at any time in the study without having to give reasons for this, or receiving any type of penalty. The data obtained will be confidential, anonymity will be kept, these data will be organized with a number assigned to each participant, there will be no record of the identity of the participants. The data will be in charge of the research team of this study for the subsequent development of reports and publications of the study results in scientific journals. The collected information will not be used for any purpose other than those indicated.
Interventions
OTHERDebriefing with TeamGAINS
The IG debriefings were conducted by the research teacher, who is trained in clinical simulation methodology, is a clinical simulation instructor, and is trained in the use of the TeamGAINS tool, using this tool as a debriefing script, in accordance with the objectives Clinical Simulation Scenario
Sponsors
University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The students did not know whether they were a control group or an intervention group
Intervention model description
The assignment of the 30 groups to the intervention or control group was randomized. Fifteen were assigned to the intervention group (IG) and were given the High-Fidelity Simulation (HFS) intervention with a debriefing script, and 15 were assigned to the control group (CG) and were given the HFS intervention without a debriefing script.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* The inclusion criterion applied was all students enrolled in the Practicum VI subject in the 2017-2018 academic year.
Exclusion criteria
* The exclusion criterion was students who did not wish to participate in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of participants who have improved their performance from structured debriefing and good clinical reasoning. | The evaluation instrument is applied during the debriefing analysis carried out at the end of the intervention, lasting one hour. | The debriefing sessions were recorded with two fixed video cameras, which were activated at the beginning of the debriefing. The purpose of the recordings was that the two facilitators and the two external evaluators could later view them in order to be able to analyze and evaluate the participants' interventions during the debriefing, applying the LCJR instrument, which allowed the assessment of the student's performance and clinical reasoning. |
Countries
Spain
Outcome results
None listed