Skip to content

Promoting Positive Emotional Functioning in Police and Military Populations

Promoting Positive Emotional Functioning in Police and Military Populations

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06035562
Enrollment
65
Registered
2023-09-13
Start date
2023-09-05
Completion date
2025-08-31
Last updated
2025-06-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anhedonia

Brief summary

This study will examine whether actively serving and veteran members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) who complete a treatment targeting anhedonia symptoms and amplifying positive emotional processing: 1) experience significant symptom reductions in anxiety, trauma, and depressive symptoms; 2) report increased experience of positive emotions; 3) report improvements to broad functioning and quality of life; and 4) find the treatment to be highly tolerable.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPVSET

6, one-hour sessions of individual therapy, consisting of Positive Valence System Enhancement Treatment for Anxiety and Depression (PVSET), which will consist of psychoeducation and positive activity interventions designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.

Sponsors

University of Manitoba
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be an actively serving or veteran member of the CAF and RCMP; * Have been referred to receive the treatment protocol at the OSIC at Deer Lodge Centre by a doctor or psychologist; * Have previously participated in at least one evidence-based psychological treatment for depressive, anxiety, or trauma-and-stressor-related condition at OSIC but remain clinically symptomatic; * Be able to speak, read, and write in English; * Have no current psychosis, untreated bipolar disorder, or current suicidal ideation with plan and intent; * Be on a stable medication regime and agree to not make changes for the duration of the treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in depression symptoms6 weeksChange in depression symptoms based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Scores on this scale range from 0-27, with higher scores indication more severe depression.
Change in anxiety symptoms6 weeksChange in anxiety symptoms based on the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS). Scores on this scale range from 0-20, with higher scores indication more severe anxiety.
Change in PTSD symptoms6 weeksChange in PTSD symptom severity based on the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Scores on this scale range from 0-80 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in positive and negative affect6 weeksChange in positive and negative affect based on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Scores on the two subscales of this assessment range from 0-50, with higher scores on the positive affect subscale representing higher levels of positive affect, and lower scores on the negative affect subscale representing lower levels of negative affect.
Treatment acceptability6 weeksAcceptability of the treatment program based on responses to a Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire. Scores on this questionnaire range from 5-30 with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
Change in quality of life6 weeksChange in quality of life as measure by the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q-SF). Scores on this scale range from 0-70, and are converted to a percentage, with higher scores indicating greater life enjoyment and satisfaction.
Psychotherapy progress6 weeksPsychotherapy progress as measured by the Outcome Questionnaire 45 (OQ-45). A total score of all subscales ranges from 0 to 180, with higher scores indicating more severe distress and functional impairment.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026