Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of AK120 in Subjects With Atopic Dermatitis

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Phase Ib/II Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of AK120 in the Treatment of Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06035354
Enrollment
427
Registered
2023-09-13
Start date
2021-11-03
Completion date
2024-06-21
Last updated
2025-03-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase Ib/II clinical study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of AK120 in the treatment of subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase Ib/II clinical study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of AK120 in subjects with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Interventions

DRUGAK120

subcutaneous injection once a week

DRUGPlacebo

subcutaneous injection once a week.

Sponsors

Akeso
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or female with age 18 - 75 years (inclusive). 2. Atopic dermatitis (AD) diagnosed at least half an year before screening. 3. Subject with EASI score ≥16, IGA ≥ 3, BSA ≥ 10% at screening and baseline. 4. Subjects with a history of an inadequate response or medically inappropriate use of topical drug treatment within 6 months.

Exclusion criteria

1. Suffering from other inflammatory diseases that may affect efficacy outcomes (such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, inflammatory bowel disease, scleroderma, inflammatory myopathy, mixed connective tissue disease, overlap syndrome, etc.). 2. History of exposure to active TB, and/or history or current evidence of TB infection. 3. Positive serology results at Screening for hepatitis B, hepatitis C or HIV. 4. Any history of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) or atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) within 6 months before the baseline visit. 5. History of clinical parasite infection, recent or planned travel to an area with endemic parasite infection within 6 months before the Screening visit 6. Any medical or psychiatric condition, laboratory, or ECG parameter which, in the opinion of the Investigator or the Sponsor's medical monitor, would place the subject at risk, interfere with participation in the study, or interfere with the interpretation of study results.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase IbBaseline to week 12Incidence of treatment emergent AE . An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment.
Phase IIat week 16Percentage of subjects who achieved (Eczema Area and Severity Index)EASI-75
Phase II Extension StudyBaseline to week 24Incidence of treatment emergent AE . An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase IbBaseline to week 12Percentage of subjects with detectable anti AK120 antibodies (ADA).
Phase IIBaseline to week 58Percentage of subjects who achieved EASI-50 (≥50% improvement from baseline) /EASI-75 (≥75% improvement from baseline) response at each visit. Higher score mean better outcome, lower score mean worse outcome
Phase II Extension StudyBaseline to week 24Percentage of subjects who achieved EASI-50 (≥50% improvement from baseline) /EASI-75 (≥75% improvement from baseline) response at each visit. Higher score mean better outcome, lower score mean worse outcome

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026