Skip to content

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Surface Treatment Versus Sandblasted Acid Etched on Stability of Delayed Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla.

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Surface Treatment Versus Sandblasted Acid Etched Surface Treatment on Stability of Delayed Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla. Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT).

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06033989
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-09-13
Start date
2023-10-01
Completion date
2025-01-01
Last updated
2023-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Loss, Missing Teeth

Keywords

Dental implant, Stability, Osseointegration, Hyaluronic acid, Sandblasted acid etched

Brief summary

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of the Effect of Hyaluronic Acid Surface Treatment Versus Sandblasted Acid Etched on Stability of Delayed Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla.

Detailed description

A dental implant is one of the procedures to restore missing teeth , to achieved the stability for implant success is the direct growth of bone to the implant surface, known as Osseointegration.As a result, bone stability around dental implants is determined by factors that the implantologist may or may not directly influence, such as local bone quality and bone metabolism, as well as systemic factors such as age, systematic chronic diseases and lifestyle (e.g., smoking habits).Treatment-related factors include augmentation material, implant design (macro and micro), surgical procedures, and loading protocols. Therefore , it may be needed for a surface treatment could alter the topography, chemical content, and roughness of the surface and result in various biological reactions. The surface treatment can also increase the area of contact between the implant and the supporting bone . The rationale is evaluate Increasing the implant stability around implants placed by using hyaluronic acid that act to improving the connection between implant and bone .Sandblasting and acid etching is the most commonly used basic method for modifying the surface of dental implants . the sandblasting procedure roughs up the outer layer of the implant,creating a surface that is easier for the bone to grip as the implant heals.While hyaluronic acid and its derivatives have a strong chance of osseointegration and mineralization and have been utilized extensively for bone repair.

Interventions

DRUGHyaluronic acid

Delayed dental implant placement after application of surface treatment to enhance Osseointegration and healing .

DRUGsandblasted, and acid-etched

Delayed dental implant placement after application of surface treatment to enhance Osseointegration and healing .

PROCEDUREDelayed dental implant

Surgical procedure of delayed dental implant in posterior maxilla after application of surface treatment to enhance Osseointegration and healing .

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with missing teeth in posterior maxilla. * Both genders males and females will be included. * Age from 18-60 years.

Exclusion criteria

* General contraindications to implant surgery. * Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation. * Untreated periodontitis. * Poor oral hygiene and motivation. * Uncontrolled diabetes. * Pregnant or nursing. * Substance abuse. * Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations. * Severe bruxism or clenching. * Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised. * Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. * Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for implant placement. * Unable to open mouth sufficiently to accommodate the surgical tooling. * Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implant stability0-3 monthsIt is assessed by using Osstell To determine the stability after intervention scale from 60 to 70 ISQ 60 low stability 70 high stability .

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
soft tissue healing10 daysIt is assessed by using gingival index in Clinical examination scale from 0 Normal 1 Mild inflammation 2 Moderate inflammation 3 Severe inflammation .
bone density3 monthsIt is assessed by using CBCT To determine the density of bone after intervention

Contacts

Primary ContactShihanah Alkashi, BSc
Shihanah.yousef@dentistry.cu.edu.eg00966542044424

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026