Skip to content

Joint Awareness After Total Knee Replacement

Joint Awareness After Cemented or Cementless Total Knee Replacement: Does it Change?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT06033625
Enrollment
150
Registered
2023-09-13
Start date
2015-01-31
Completion date
2019-01-31
Last updated
2023-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty Complications, Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

Joint Awareness, Total Knee Replacement, Cementless, Forgotten Joint Score, Patient's Joint Perception

Brief summary

Total knee replacement (TKR) is accepted as treatment of choice for end stage gonarthrosis. It is performed cemented or cementless and although cemented implants were shown to decrease bone density more than cementless fixations there is no evidence-based difference between them in the literature. As far as the investigators are concerned, the effect of cementation on patients' joint perception has never been studied so far.

Detailed description

In this longitudinal case-control study, joint awareness in prosthetic reconstruction was evaluated in 150 knees (75 cemented TKR, 75 cementless TKR) of 136 patients. They were operated between 2015 and 2017 in our institution with minimum 5 years of follow up. All the patients in each group were operated by two senior surgeons that were experienced for more than 10 years in arthroplasty. To reduce selection bias, logistic regression was used to develop propensity-matched pairs based on gender, age, body mass index (BMI), preoperative coronal plane deformity, preoperative range of motion (ROM) and appropriateness for TKA indication. Demographic and clinical data including sex, age and time since surgery were collected. The subjects' joint perception and the WOMAC clinical scores were recorded and compared. Joint awareness is assessed with Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) which has 12 questions and with Patient's Joint Perception questionnaire (PJP) which is a single question with 5 possible answers, rating from the highest expected result like a native or natural joint to the worse possible case a non-functional joint. Other than clinical scores, laboratory parameters, blood transfusion needs, tourniquet time, complications (septic/aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, instability) and revision rates were also compared.

Interventions

CEMENTLESS CRUCIATE RETAINING BICOMPARTMENTAL TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT

Sponsors

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* primary knee osteoarthritis * appropriate'' TKA indication according to Modified Escobar System

Exclusion criteria

* secondary osteoarthritis * previous surgery to the knee * valgus knee * uncontrolled diabetes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12)1 year after index surgery and at the end of 5th yeara patient-reported outcome measure intended to determine a patient's ability to forget about their affected joint after surgery or treatment and uses a 5-point Likert response format (0, never; 1, almost; 2, seldom; 3,sometimes; and 4, mostly) with high scores indicate good outcome, which means a high degree of forgetting the joint
Patient's Joint Perception questionnaire (PJP)1 year after index surgery and at the end of 5th yearThe PJP is a single question with 5 possible answers, rating from the highest expected result like a native or natural joint to the worsening gradually as Artificial joint with no restriction, Artificial joint with minimal restriction, Artificial joint with major restriction and a non-functional joint

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)1 year after index surgery and at the end of 5th yearThe WOMAC is a specific, valid, and reliable measure for OA, consisting of 24 questions in three subcategories: pain, stiffness, and physical function. Each question is scored using a Likert scale as follows: 0=nothing, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe. The score for each section is calculated separately, and the total score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate an increase in pain and stiffness, as well as a deterioration in physical function.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026